Cycle of Violence within Politics

This tool is needed THORN it needs your help, DONATE to help stop child sexual abuse.


Mrs. Bill Clinton gave me this idea and I wanted this so badly, I got this idea from thinking about her and watching her speak in the past. I got this idea from writing about them as a married couple. That the cycle of violence is on her and her husband, all they wanted to do was discuss laws and figure out what works in this country.

The crucifixion was about political speech. What do you think Jesus Christ was doing? He was walking around giving his political opinion without running for office. And he never had the vote for a Roman senator for his region of life. Nor did Jesus Christ have the ability to shape the laws of the land without giving his opinion openly. Which he did give his opinions to the point of a conviction with the death penalty.

The luxury about the Clinton’s is that they have the right to run for office, they have the right to their political opinion without the fear of violence against their bodies. That law is in  place to protect them, but the cycle of violent political speech continues even in this modern day.

Hillary Clinton could be crucified just for one bad political decision, that we put her in office to make. Her political future could die based on that. She risked her future and her families future to have that ability in the first place to make that bad decision. Prison can be a fate of an American politician, and it seems rare, right now, but it is the truth.

It was not extreme speech that places people in the cycle of violence in politics today, it is simply talking about preferences now from the preference of trees in a parking lot, to speaking of war to defend the country to protect resources of people and property, that political speech can lead to rocks in windows or threats to families. That is the cycle of violence.

The give give that was suggested is where political speech has to happen, but how when people want to force their own will and not hearing out how their will HURTS MANY!!!

Mrs. Clinton does not want many to be hurt, but she does want a give and take, you do this this reward happens, you do that the correctional facility is for you penalty. Budgets are the same way, you do this the money is there for you, you do that the correctional facility is there as a penalty. Give give is that simple, it takes away the threats of violence.

Mrs. Clinton is the best example for this blog post, because she has gone through so much politically, she is indeed like Jesus Christ. I will go over her record later, I am betting some already know what I can praise her for, just like Jesus Christ.



Loving Consent


I fell in love with a polyamorous woman. That does not mean I am a lesbian but it does. I  know that sentence means I want to talk about communication about sex, and I  know there is no secret word from my readers to tell me stop. Remember I am into BDSM and safe words because I am not into sexual abuses.

It was not hard telling her I could not come into her family, where she had two men with her at the time. I lived a few states away. I just wasn’t ready. And I was living far from her at the time. She lives closer to me now, I haven’t seen her in decades, but that is closed. I maybe polyamorous too.

I am not going to seek her out, and hers was a deep loving writing friendship, her love for me was in her writing and I saw that. She was there during my divorce when I needed her the most, and when I found out about polyamorous relationships it was from her.

Yes, she was my first polyamorous love. But I am the one that cannot commit. Just me, I am not into commitments. I am into my self-denial and celibacy, which is my Masochism. I was not practicing my masochism when I told the wonderful polyamorist lady that I could not join her closed family. I was being honest and I had hoped communicated well.

Masochism is when a person takes pleasure in self denial. I am not certain about humiliation, it is added into masochisms definition, I do not think I am a person that gets pleasure from being humiliated. But who knows maybe that is a truth I am not ready to face yet.

Example of a masochist, a comedian, Jimmy Fallon.

I want to make certain everybody knows a polyamory is NOT AN OPEN RELATIONSHIP WHERE EVERYBODY JOINS. It is a closed private relationship like monogamy.

Is it sexually abusive writing about sexual preferences? I don’t think so. But since this is about how people communicate. Masochism isn’t self abuse, people might think it is, but most are very cool with who I am in public. Privately if they have issues, I hope they keep their opinions to themselves, but if they do not, well my opinions are very public.

Being in a polyamory could feed voyeurisms. I am big into voyeurism, I go to the movies when I can and my collection of movies is extensive. I understand people into voyeurism can be exploited by the movie industry and it does this to us all the time. Providing interesting things to watch, so the industry is something I as a person into voyeurism loves.

I am not into sexual abuses of any kind, that is my BDSM and I want to go into that now. Explaining polyamory is a closed relationship is VERY important to me, what is also important to me is to speak on how to stop verbal abuses, again I am not one to speak right, I have to admit to being human and we all have speech issues when it comes to forming language when some terrible mean emotions come about.

Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism  is not about being into abusing.


BDSM is into CONSENT. What is consent? It is permission to do what you want to a persons body by that person.

IF YOU ARE INTO NONCONSENT, there is a district attorney waiting to meet you and a judge to sentence you to a correctional facility.

ALL BDSM PEOPLE HATE NONCONSENT PEOPLE, consent is the sexual kink in BDSM. AND it is re-enforced in the teaching of BDSM. The safe word in BDSM is to stop any abuse that might be happening or perceived. And that word, as long as it is USED and respected, makes certain consent is right there at all times.

I am going to talk about my voyeurism because Ashton Kutcher did mention what Thorn does do. AND people using children to try to exploit me  and use my sexual kink need life time prison sentences.

I am BDSM, and as I wrote consent is my kink, tell me when a child is OLD ENOUGH TO CONSENT!!!!! They never will be.

I’ll watch Aston Kutcher on screen for Spread. That is voyeurism. I will not watch what Mr. Kutcher mentioned in his testimony, when he was talking about what he founded to catch and free children from sexual abuse: THORN. I refuse as a voyeur to even seek that viewing out.

Voyeurism is seeking out for sexual pleasure something to watch. I have found females very silent about their voyeurism needs, I am guessing it is because of Judeo-Christian family values that women and women’s magazines do not write about Females into voyeurism. I can get away with mine because of the industry, the movie industry. In the past women just were in orgy’s right for their voyeurism?

Anyway, I need to sum this up. People now know more about where I am coming from. I am completely into consensual sex and consensual non-abusive communication. I have not told how I got this enlightenment, just who I am… keep reading, because more women and men will communicate better before I die.



Twitter social media And political Distraction for Children’s and Women’s rights: FBI come out for me…

maxresdefaultI do use social media and twitter, is there a distraction there about children’s rights and women’s rights?

I do not know so I am going to write down ideas and see if I agree with the above question.

I have been an author, and I use sexual stuff in my writing, in my mind people have the right to state, I am not reading what you write, I have written adult content even here on this new blog. People still have the right not to read me. But on twitter, is there human rights violations happening before your eyes. That might be happening. Or other social networking places.

Ashton Kutcher do not pretend to be children’s programing. I’m the same.

I am not dabbling like Ashton has in children’s content.

Ashton Kutcher has Open Season, that might lead to children coming over to his twitter account. And do parents want children to know about sex trafficking? Has Ashton Kutcher violated human rights of children by trying to push forward the human right to not be kidnapped and sexualized?

What is my right as a content creator about children’s rights? I cannot pussy foot around this issue because it is woman’s rights.

Why can’t twitter be like Netflix, it is so simple, a place for kids, where an adult account like mine has no place of being or going. Yes I can go over to read Netflix for kids. But maybe I don’t wanna read kids on twitter. I don’t even look but a child pornographer might.

What I did see on Justin Timberlake’s twitter account feed is parents innocently having children dance to his CHILDREN”S CONTENT, Can’t Stop the Feeling from Trolls, but then I saw a stripper… I don’t know, I write adult stuff, I don’t really want to censor myself for a parent… FBI come and get me, bad old Amanda doing her same old politics…

Justin Timberlake is an adult star with both adult and children’s content. What I would love to see is a split on his account, go here for kids content, go here for the adult content, separating out the videos where kids are dancing and the strippers.

Jimmy Fallon, another example, and the Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon is an adult artist. Ewww is not for children, but he is in open space Twitter. Do you think he’s on late night for your children to view his show? But Twitter is during the day.

SNL, I could go on and on about adult content.

I don’t know how many people view a Twitter stream and then try to show their child something, oops I lost that scroll, the child is watching, ignore that woman’s selfie she showed cleavage… on SNL’s twitter feed.

I am an adult content generator. I know all I really want is adults attention. I know for money to sustain lifestyles some entertainers/action stars do children’s media. Why can’t social media have areas safe for children?

NOW FBI and international investigators, I live in Anchorage, ALASKA currently and I am not paranoid… Can’t be I was on the NO FLY LIST. I break laws about internet daily about content… I write adult content and a child might have been exposed. I cannot stop that, right? This is total BS right, oh California once again I am not placing a shield on this web-site saying this isn’t for children… Law smashed to bits…