Cycle of Violence within Politics

This tool is needed THORN it needs your help, DONATE to help stop child sexual abuse.


Mrs. Bill Clinton gave me this idea and I wanted this so badly, I got this idea from thinking about her and watching her speak in the past. I got this idea from writing about them as a married couple. That the cycle of violence is on her and her husband, all they wanted to do was discuss laws and figure out what works in this country.

The crucifixion was about political speech. What do you think Jesus Christ was doing? He was walking around giving his political opinion without running for office. And he never had the vote for a Roman senator for his region of life. Nor did Jesus Christ have the ability to shape the laws of the land without giving his opinion openly. Which he did give his opinions to the point of a conviction with the death penalty.

The luxury about the Clinton’s is that they have the right to run for office, they have the right to their political opinion without the fear of violence against their bodies. That law is in  place to protect them, but the cycle of violent political speech continues even in this modern day.

Hillary Clinton could be crucified just for one bad political decision, that we put her in office to make. Her political future could die based on that. She risked her future and her families future to have that ability in the first place to make that bad decision. Prison can be a fate of an American politician, and it seems rare, right now, but it is the truth.

It was not extreme speech that places people in the cycle of violence in politics today, it is simply talking about preferences now from the preference of trees in a parking lot, to speaking of war to defend the country to protect resources of people and property, that political speech can lead to rocks in windows or threats to families. That is the cycle of violence.

The give give that was suggested is where political speech has to happen, but how when people want to force their own will and not hearing out how their will HURTS MANY!!!

Mrs. Clinton does not want many to be hurt, but she does want a give and take, you do this this reward happens, you do that the correctional facility is for you penalty. Budgets are the same way, you do this the money is there for you, you do that the correctional facility is there as a penalty. Give give is that simple, it takes away the threats of violence.

Mrs. Clinton is the best example for this blog post, because she has gone through so much politically, she is indeed like Jesus Christ. I will go over her record later, I am betting some already know what I can praise her for, just like Jesus Christ.



Divorce is new harem Revisted

imagesclock  Harems are old fashion, very conservative, and so not apart of modern American, why am I writing about them again. It is a liberal idea one man and one woman for the rest of your life. Yes monogamy is a liberal idea and not conservation one.

Some might not have heard of, or let alone read, or even read the article Divorce is the New Harem, so the concept of the article was simple, man conservatively wants multiple women for maximum amount of reproductive success, divorce allows for this publically.

I was wrong about Divorce being apart of the conservative male mindset, it now moves to the liberal male mindset column, which might frighten the herd male who wants all the females to himself with very little sharing.

I thought it was a conservative value divorce, and then having the second and then third family.  You see harem has formed another woman and then possibly another woman with maximum possibilities of reproduction.

The herd is the most conservative sexual value of a male. A herd of horses might have 30 females and 3 males maximum, again read that once if that information changed I do not know. In the herd a fowl would be born, a female had a better chance of staying alive, but the tiny new born sperm producer might not, this is on video numerous times about many different herds and groups like walrus’s. THE MALE CHILD, SPERM PRODUCER, BABY BOY, MIGHT NOT SURVIVE.

The Harem, for humans, is just another form of the herd, and it does the same thing but one, MALES, MEN, SPERM PRODUCERS might survive, human reproduction accomplished with maximum success of passing genes on. The MALE LIVES YES!

Divorce might produce more male and female offspring, by getting another female involved, hoping the first female does not remarry… that is the catch, the first female does not reproduce again and never is touched by another man might be the hope of a divorced male.

So here’s my retraction article, a divorce is not a new harem for the male, it is the start of a Polyamory. A polyamory is a relationship of multiple males and females that has the possibility of new communication about sexual intercourse and reproduction.

A divorce starts a polyamory family.

The male and female might as well bring the new partners into the lives of the home and children right away, this is to discuss the former marriage, problems it had and introduce the new partners Men and Women to one another in a non-hostile emotionless way.

I like polyamory, I am polyamorous, not into polygamy. I am into pansexuality, new term, I might be a lesbian.  These terms are a part of women’s politics. They need exploring by women’s candidates with Man’s support. Because these new families exist, they are divorced but might have just communication problems because a new little one by another man for the woman for example needed to come into the world. Why not come into the  world having two dads with one mom? Polyamory is divorce.

So I apologize to my old readers and new, I was wrong, Divorce is not a new harem for males. It is the start of a new liberal idea for PANSEXUALS, Polyamorous individuals, and women.