Cycle of Violence within Politics

This tool is needed THORN it needs your help, DONATE to help stop child sexual abuse.


Mrs. Bill Clinton gave me this idea and I wanted this so badly, I got this idea from thinking about her and watching her speak in the past. I got this idea from writing about them as a married couple. That the cycle of violence is on her and her husband, all they wanted to do was discuss laws and figure out what works in this country.

The crucifixion was about political speech. What do you think Jesus Christ was doing? He was walking around giving his political opinion without running for office. And he never had the vote for a Roman senator for his region of life. Nor did Jesus Christ have the ability to shape the laws of the land without giving his opinion openly. Which he did give his opinions to the point of a conviction with the death penalty.

The luxury about the Clinton’s is that they have the right to run for office, they have the right to their political opinion without the fear of violence against their bodies. That law is in  place to protect them, but the cycle of violent political speech continues even in this modern day.

Hillary Clinton could be crucified just for one bad political decision, that we put her in office to make. Her political future could die based on that. She risked her future and her families future to have that ability in the first place to make that bad decision. Prison can be a fate of an American politician, and it seems rare, right now, but it is the truth.

It was not extreme speech that places people in the cycle of violence in politics today, it is simply talking about preferences now from the preference of trees in a parking lot, to speaking of war to defend the country to protect resources of people and property, that political speech can lead to rocks in windows or threats to families. That is the cycle of violence.

The give give that was suggested is where political speech has to happen, but how when people want to force their own will and not hearing out how their will HURTS MANY!!!

Mrs. Clinton does not want many to be hurt, but she does want a give and take, you do this this reward happens, you do that the correctional facility is for you penalty. Budgets are the same way, you do this the money is there for you, you do that the correctional facility is there as a penalty. Give give is that simple, it takes away the threats of violence.

Mrs. Clinton is the best example for this blog post, because she has gone through so much politically, she is indeed like Jesus Christ. I will go over her record later, I am betting some already know what I can praise her for, just like Jesus Christ.



Steve Jobs and the Printing Press

woodenblocksDid Steve Jobs reinvent the printing press, or did he have to research handwriting, wooden printer blocks, seeing how much ink was really taken from the printer blocks to name a new font or did he pull shit out of his ass to create what you are reading right now on this screen?

1920 August 20 the 19th amendment to the US Constitution was handed over to women. The right to vote. BY MEN LIKE STEVE JOBS. 100 years later where are women’s rights currently, a system of fear. Fear that that woman cannot defend herself in an innocent until proven guilty country. DO NOT CHANGE THAT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY THAT IS A DIAMOND!!!! NEVER CHANGE THAT!!!

We would never have had Steve Jobs without that concept. The concept of innocent until proven guilty says Steve Jobs can research without fears of being told, the printing press was invented don’t try to step on that patent. The system of innocent until proven guilty creates a system for open libraries and safe research. Patents are still protected but an inventor has the right to research to create new technologies. And Steve Jobs thrived in our system.

Innocent until proven guilty created our technologies and encouraged more development of higher learning institutions. Some stuff about Steve Jobs will not be in this article. Because in the end he’s an inventor and I am into politics, sometimes that is not a same that goes well together. While Mr. Jobs had no need for government but to pay taxes for police protection over his buildings and judges to guard his new found patents, he might not involved himself completely in Woman’s rights politics.

Once I run into this problem communication, Steve Jobs might not have invented the printing press, but he invented ways for me to write about politics. He found ways for people like me to get involved. He opened up government for it to be discovered communication between the sexes about politics is still not happening clearly.

How can it be clear in an innocent until proven guilty environment? NEVER CHANGE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. Communication was the I-phone and his personal computers, Steve Jobs showed the way that communication is the key to getting a woman elected in the environment that the USA created.

Men are telling women the truth, they gave us the vote. That is communication. MEN ARE TALKING, and did women listen no. We vote. We hold some offices but we are minority when we equally are born in this country. Men do talk to women. Why are women not listening? Men like Steve Jobs are telling us something about their fears about women in office, and we are still not hearing and comprehending. Once women hear and comprehend, men might share the White House with women elected as president.