Cycle of Violence within Politics

This tool is needed THORN it needs your help, DONATE to help stop child sexual abuse.

The-crucifixion-in-The-Life-of-Brian-1290006

Mrs. Bill Clinton gave me this idea and I wanted this so badly, I got this idea from thinking about her and watching her speak in the past. I got this idea from writing about them as a married couple. That the cycle of violence is on her and her husband, all they wanted to do was discuss laws and figure out what works in this country.

The crucifixion was about political speech. What do you think Jesus Christ was doing? He was walking around giving his political opinion without running for office. And he never had the vote for a Roman senator for his region of life. Nor did Jesus Christ have the ability to shape the laws of the land without giving his opinion openly. Which he did give his opinions to the point of a conviction with the death penalty.

The luxury about the Clinton’s is that they have the right to run for office, they have the right to their political opinion without the fear of violence against their bodies. That law is in  place to protect them, but the cycle of violent political speech continues even in this modern day.

Hillary Clinton could be crucified just for one bad political decision, that we put her in office to make. Her political future could die based on that. She risked her future and her families future to have that ability in the first place to make that bad decision. Prison can be a fate of an American politician, and it seems rare, right now, but it is the truth.

It was not extreme speech that places people in the cycle of violence in politics today, it is simply talking about preferences now from the preference of trees in a parking lot, to speaking of war to defend the country to protect resources of people and property, that political speech can lead to rocks in windows or threats to families. That is the cycle of violence.

The give give that was suggested is where political speech has to happen, but how when people want to force their own will and not hearing out how their will HURTS MANY!!!

Mrs. Clinton does not want many to be hurt, but she does want a give and take, you do this this reward happens, you do that the correctional facility is for you penalty. Budgets are the same way, you do this the money is there for you, you do that the correctional facility is there as a penalty. Give give is that simple, it takes away the threats of violence.

Mrs. Clinton is the best example for this blog post, because she has gone through so much politically, she is indeed like Jesus Christ. I will go over her record later, I am betting some already know what I can praise her for, just like Jesus Christ.

 

 

Polyamory does not mean Sexual Freedom

Post-2016OCT-PolyTrueLove

This topic is WWAB or Wise Women and Beyond. How to start talking about voting if I cannot get into your home and get you moved to that ballot box in favor of a candidate that might not be you, but has the same ideas you have? I have to describe different voters and voting groups first, in my mind that works.

So this article is exclusively Polyamory, and the slang is Poly, but I don’t like the slang because I am not writing about Polygamy today. Men might not understand what a Polyamory is, from one person so far that is truth. And if one person holds wrong ideas about a CLOSED FAMILY, then what? A group judged as wrong and immoral?

First Monogamy is a closed family. Closed is obvious, if you are in an open relationship you get to see other people, in a monogamy it is closed you decided with communication to only be with that person. In society that is approved and encouraged through religion and government. Taxes state single or head of house hold with the assumption it is a monogamy.

Second Polyamory is a communicative relationship about life. It will include sex in those adult conversations. It does not mean you have the sexual freedom to abuse someone. A polyamory is a loving relationship with healthy sexual behavior that talks about fetishes and BDSM. Some Polyamous family do not do BDSM because of the open communication, not saying BDSM is not open communication, it is just that people are not into that kind of sexual speaking.

Third, again I want to emphasis, it is a closed relationship that is committed to for decades until death for some. This is like a monogamy, according to monogamy people and what they advertise, which Polyamous people know the truth, monogamy is different and might not be into non-abusive communication about everything including sex, hence the divorce rates are still high in monogamies.

Polyamory’s are not SWINGERS. I need to research swingers because I am not one, I was not interested in learning about that group of adults, which are into being with other adults which seems like an open relationship to me.

This is a voting group. And others might not vote for a polyamorous candidate because of one detail, the sex is not NORMAL? Whatever that means, I’m BDSM, not really a fetish person and I will devote an entire article on fetishs later.

But what if a polygamous person is for funding law enforcement to keep sex offenders off the street because of sex offenders trying to use their group to hide real intentions, like sex traffickers. That person would be on the side of Monogamous people right, but because of one difference that man or woman cannot get the vote. Food for thought.