My own Hypocrisy 9/11

butterfly

This sad day happened and for me I was here in Anchorage, Alaska, on Lake Otis, well a little off that road near Dimond BLVD, and I was getting a phone call. “Amanda, have you seen what is happening?” I turned on TV and there it was a burning tower. I was unsaved then, since my save date for taking Jesus inside is 9/22/2011.

I was no where near my fathers home, on Muldoon Rd, off of the military base. I was no where near my family in New York State, and I did talk to my dad later about where they were, no where near luckily. Like everybody else I watched the towers fall to the ground with footage going over and over and over and over of the planes, two, hitting the towers.

My reaction over the past couple of decades, well, it really isn’t a couple of decades, nearly, has been what I am, and this Mutt will take time to explain where I come from.

Terrorism is an act of creating fear. I refused to be fearful while I watched this nation grieve. I complained and partied. And nobody was complaining and partying, maybe privately. I did so on line many times, and yes even today I want a 9/11 music mix to sing to and say the dead in those towers deserve smiles and memories that are good created today. The people in the PLANES deserve nothing from me. ABSOLUTLY NOTHING!!!!

I mean the pilots not the passengers.

Something kicks in from my Irish/Native American grandfather side of my family, and that side had married my grandmother the Russian/polish woman which I do not think has if you grieve you party like the Irish. On my mom’s side what I do is highly inappropriate but she was English/native mix her mother and her father would’ve been shamed with his French/Mediterranean (African northern). Muslims are photo’d grieving, and my grandfather was catholic, so not Muslim, but he had traditions that were clearly that region of the world.

My Irish/native American hard working grandfather (dad’s Side) did party, a lot and laughed and was one of those men you go good man, he just partied a lot with his family. He might have told me what I did was inappropriate like many other people have. I still want to celebrate the victims lives. NOT BE FEARFUL BECAUSE…it might happen again.

Some movies were told to be made too soon, this person might have publically agreed which is my hypocrisy. I am a hypocrite, on one hand I did my thing to honor the victims of the pilots, while Hollywood did the same thing, I’m the same as the action stars but I was a hypocrite, them too.

I hope to stop my hypocrisy and start enjoying 9/11 tribute movies. I haven’t yet, and I want to add them to my party today, I do inappropriately but very IRISH OF ME.

 

 

Rainbow Coalition: Rights of women my headline is deceptive

votersrainbowpushHuman rights and the ability to save humanity, core values of the Rainbow Coalition. AND this value is international from Canada to Australia. That is the broadest coolest thing ever read, and it is for a rainbow of peoples.

Men gave women the vote in 1920. They needed a Rainbow Coalition then.

Innocent until proven guilty a diamond in my mind is protected by the Rainbow Coalition and they pay to help innocent men that were framed to get out of prison with no record.

Running for office is what the Rainbow Push Coalition organization has helped people do, and I am hoping the organization can help this little woman’s rights blog get those same goals accomplished, just with more women in mind. I know the Rainbow Coalition candidates are women and men.

So here is what I am going to say, woman’s right and human rights are the SAME CONCEPT. Human rights is equal pay for an equal days work. Doesn’t matter color, immigration status or sex. It is a human right to have a livable wage.

Since it is a human right, why are men afraid. In 1920 there was no fears about women getting the vote. The 19th amendment granted that human right. A woman of any color could go to the ballot box and vote. The history of voter suppression happened and still happens… I also think it is a history of candidate suppression, that the most capable candidate is not running. I hope the Rainbow Push Coalition does acknowledge this.
Candidate suppression is simple. A confident man full of ideas and guts wants to run, first the family puts him down, if he gets past that then his own friends put him down, only a few get encouraged. And maybe that is why in some elections even today there is still one color, white. Candidate suppression is not a color blind crime.

The country needs candidates. From every walk of life, not just attorneys. Women are apart of the candidate suppression, maybe some women are the family members putting down someone that wants the media to run for office. I need those women to put their own stuff aside and encourage the candidate that wants to run that is their family member.

I will write more on the Rainbow Coalition with more research. Today I wanted Candidate suppression written about, and I did it.

.

Telling the Truth: TTT Get it World Wide Web

leather-armor-corsets-3

BDSM has not been explained to the satisfaction of myself, and myself includes an inner voice that is male that bugs me and I want to have around. I am female, first and foremost, and want to stay female, I love my lesbian tendencies. I am woman, but his thoughts are needed to gain the voters, because again my thing 1920 MEN GAVE WOMEN VOTING RIGHTS.

Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism is a form of sex that is highly communicative in the bedroom. This high communication is broken into Dominant and Submissive. I admittedly am a submissive. I like that better than Dominant. The dominant has to be the best listener on the planet. That person can with the truth from open naked communication do what he or she pleases in the bedroom. There is a communication opening here that I love, called the safe word.  The safe word is used by the submissive when things are emotionally too much for the submissive. It also can be used when something is too physical.

The listener/dominant responds by stopping. This household speaking can go outside of the bedroom, and continue the communication using the same rules and the dominant can use the safe word too, nothing is brought into the bedroom without communication, there are no surprises.

I find this the most non-abusive sexually speaking. I was raised in a home that misused BDSM, a lot of homes from my understanding do this, that means sometimes the failures of the language did happen, and cycle of violence started from that.

My parents explained BDSM to me, and I wanted that safe word so bad, that it is me.

This is why I did not enter into a polyamorous relationship, because I do communicate well, as a polyamorist I just know I would make the commitment, but I need to trust my safe words are used, and I did not know if that particular family would. I did not ask if that family would use my need to have a safe word. I just cut them off because I was not ready for that committed communication.

BDSM stops the cycle of violence if used properly and does not really start the cycle in the first place.

I am not calling out the people who misuse BDSM and are just fetish people. Those individuals have to know themselves and do the soul searching, I did for myself. By the way, the photo above is a garment, it can be used both for BDSM play and fetish. Fetish is different than the communication from BDSM, fetish can use the communication from BDSM but it does not, and tries to place itself in BDSM and it was not there in the first place.

A lot of fetish stuff is placed in BDSM. This is not a write up on fetishes, it is a write up on communication, safe words, listening stopping when a safe word is stated.

The 1920 Men giving women the vote, those men might have heard what women wanted because that set of men were good listeners/dominants. Currently are women listening back: Listeners/Dominants. Can the woman, who wants to be a dominant, hear man’s safe word? And comprehend his safe word? What is his safe word? So women can win elections and work with MAN.

 

Polyamory does not mean Sexual Freedom

Post-2016OCT-PolyTrueLove

This topic is WWAB or Wise Women and Beyond. How to start talking about voting if I cannot get into your home and get you moved to that ballot box in favor of a candidate that might not be you, but has the same ideas you have? I have to describe different voters and voting groups first, in my mind that works.

So this article is exclusively Polyamory, and the slang is Poly, but I don’t like the slang because I am not writing about Polygamy today. Men might not understand what a Polyamory is, from one person so far that is truth. And if one person holds wrong ideas about a CLOSED FAMILY, then what? A group judged as wrong and immoral?

First Monogamy is a closed family. Closed is obvious, if you are in an open relationship you get to see other people, in a monogamy it is closed you decided with communication to only be with that person. In society that is approved and encouraged through religion and government. Taxes state single or head of house hold with the assumption it is a monogamy.

Second Polyamory is a communicative relationship about life. It will include sex in those adult conversations. It does not mean you have the sexual freedom to abuse someone. A polyamory is a loving relationship with healthy sexual behavior that talks about fetishes and BDSM. Some Polyamous family do not do BDSM because of the open communication, not saying BDSM is not open communication, it is just that people are not into that kind of sexual speaking.

Third, again I want to emphasis, it is a closed relationship that is committed to for decades until death for some. This is like a monogamy, according to monogamy people and what they advertise, which Polyamous people know the truth, monogamy is different and might not be into non-abusive communication about everything including sex, hence the divorce rates are still high in monogamies.

Polyamory’s are not SWINGERS. I need to research swingers because I am not one, I was not interested in learning about that group of adults, which are into being with other adults which seems like an open relationship to me.

This is a voting group. And others might not vote for a polyamorous candidate because of one detail, the sex is not NORMAL? Whatever that means, I’m BDSM, not really a fetish person and I will devote an entire article on fetishs later.

But what if a polygamous person is for funding law enforcement to keep sex offenders off the street because of sex offenders trying to use their group to hide real intentions, like sex traffickers. That person would be on the side of Monogamous people right, but because of one difference that man or woman cannot get the vote. Food for thought.

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton show a communication nobody is showing in politics

150303_POL_Clintons2012_jpg_CROP_promo-mediumlarge

Mention her senator election, her secretary of state time, and both runs for becoming president this is my expectation for this post, that Hillary Clinton is this accomplished woman. I also need to mention how former President Clinton has done the support of 1920 men that gave women the vote, and he used that upon his own spouse Hillary Clinton.

I am not capable to write a politics novel on this topic, and I know someone will plus get the money from that becoming a best seller. I know my capabilities and I might have seemed abusive in the past to the candidate Hillary Clinton. I do not love that cycle of violence and I am continuing to learn about that very topic and applying that all over the place, including writing about Mrs. Hillary Clinton.

This is a honeymoon article, maybe I can stay in that forever, but then my expectations of the couple happen and I get disappointed. That leads to me leaving and going after another candidate. Going well, I see the capabilities of the couple, and the candidate Hillary Clinton, but I am not controlling what they are representing, so they cannot represent me based on that little tiny detail.

I need to give up that tiny detail right, and it might be a miscommunication. I had to learn about the cycle of violence because it affects me personally, and to attract an abuser sometimes abuse happens, mine is politics, I am definitely in a cycle of victory and loser politics, and that attracted abusers who do not communicate well into my life, making myself their victim.

Does Hillary Clinton not communicate well, NO, she is one of the best communicators on the planet. And so is her husband Bill Clinton. That communication is in how both thrive together in a political environment. When Mr. Clinton was in office in the 1990’s the communication between the two was scene with him trying to step back during the health care law that Hillary Clinton was trying to put through. The problem was she was his wife, and the media abused her for doing what Ashton Kutcher has done for his company and need to save women and children from sex trafficking.

I’m sorry Mr. Kutcher for using you, but I am using your time in front of a congressional panel, you are a respected private citizen. There is no difference, between you and Hillary Clinton. She is a private citizen proposing law at the time. Ashton Kutcher, he is a private citizen proposing to a panel the same thing.

That communication President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton had led to her win as Senator of New York  State, my birth state. And then gracious handing over the nomination to President Obama during his first election. The communication between the couple, to me, is non-abusive communication, and there seems to be from observation no cycle of violence. So why can’t other men be like Mr. Clinton and support spouses for assembly, the senate, the congress, and the president? I don’t know.

As I said the communication alone is a best selling novel. Someone will write someday. I wanted this for WWAB, because somewhere in our nation the fear of communication has to be faced, and we will really be the home of the brave then.

 

 

Polygamy no PORN needed: Polyamory where is the orgy???

eminemsuper

Polygamy’s might have orgy’s, might, that I am not researching for this post. A polyamory might have orgy’s, see they are the same concept. I do know without research an orgy if spoken about and consented too a polyamory has them.

Polyamory is called immoral because of the orgy’s of the past. And yes that is insulting to true polyamorist. I am once again Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism. When I was introduced to a polyamorist family, I was enlightened they are same as me, just not into BDSM as what they call themselves. I was delighted about the loving conversation and about consent and love.

First a polyamory family involves women and men, it is not a polygamy. Second the polyamory believes and puts into practice the same rules of sexual conversation as a BDSM person. I kept my BDSM to myself and did state to the woman who is the polyamorist I could be like her, never really speaking on who I am, which means I communicated poorly. I was asked, and told her I was not ready for a commitment in her family. I am still thinking of her loving her in the way I can, and she would say that is true polyamorist. Third a polyamory can lead to children from two men on one woman, so that might seem immoral when both daddies have consented to this and LIVE WITH THE MOTHER.

TWO DADDIES LIVE IN THE SAME HOME AS THE MOTHER.

I am in love with the woman who introduced Polyamory to me, but I am still not ready for the commitment that is needed with her. So I am here explaining that to an audience to explain open sexual communication. Sadly, I do not speak with her any longer because of myself and my own needs.

Consent is the key to all three types of sexual behavior. A polygamy a woman and a man consent. Polyamory a woman and a man consent. BDSM a woman and a man consent and go deeper with specific wording in sexual behavior.

Abusive conversation can happen in all sexual relationships. Polyamory and BDSM address this openly trying to not abuse sexually anybody. I am saying this conversation does not happen in polygamy or monogamies. I have proof in monogamies that might have needed to become polyamory’s, because divorce courts and family courts are full of people wanting no open naked sexual conversation about their sexual needs.

I have a hard time getting people to speak about open communication. Polyamory is not there to set up orgy’s. It is not immoral.

In a polygamy, I wrote porn not needed. That truth might floor people, but where is the man’s need to watch other men have sex. There would be none. That man might have a need to see woman on woman action, but him watching other men in a voyeurism isn’t there.

Polyamorist might not be into orgy’s. But they are into the communication and consent of orgy’s. A polyamorist is not into unconsentual sex. That is an abomination to a polyamorist, like it is an abomination to a BDSM person.

Polyamory is about loving communication, so is BDSM. That loving communication is not just sexual. And that means Polyamory isn’t about voyeurism or orgy’s unless that is completely talked about and consented to in a polyamorous group. So my headline brought people in, it is a woman’s right to chose what she is sexually. And I am going to explore all of this some more.

Polygamy’s might not love a polygamous family, but communication is key to both. And both might exist in a world where they are illegal and I still say keep them illegal, even if I am who I am, perhaps a polyamous person after all.

 

Steve Jobs and the Printing Press

woodenblocksDid Steve Jobs reinvent the printing press, or did he have to research handwriting, wooden printer blocks, seeing how much ink was really taken from the printer blocks to name a new font or did he pull shit out of his ass to create what you are reading right now on this screen?

1920 August 20 the 19th amendment to the US Constitution was handed over to women. The right to vote. BY MEN LIKE STEVE JOBS. 100 years later where are women’s rights currently, a system of fear. Fear that that woman cannot defend herself in an innocent until proven guilty country. DO NOT CHANGE THAT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY THAT IS A DIAMOND!!!! NEVER CHANGE THAT!!!

We would never have had Steve Jobs without that concept. The concept of innocent until proven guilty says Steve Jobs can research without fears of being told, the printing press was invented don’t try to step on that patent. The system of innocent until proven guilty creates a system for open libraries and safe research. Patents are still protected but an inventor has the right to research to create new technologies. And Steve Jobs thrived in our system.

Innocent until proven guilty created our technologies and encouraged more development of higher learning institutions. Some stuff about Steve Jobs will not be in this article. Because in the end he’s an inventor and I am into politics, sometimes that is not a same that goes well together. While Mr. Jobs had no need for government but to pay taxes for police protection over his buildings and judges to guard his new found patents, he might not involved himself completely in Woman’s rights politics.

Once I run into this problem communication, Steve Jobs might not have invented the printing press, but he invented ways for me to write about politics. He found ways for people like me to get involved. He opened up government for it to be discovered communication between the sexes about politics is still not happening clearly.

How can it be clear in an innocent until proven guilty environment? NEVER CHANGE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. Communication was the I-phone and his personal computers, Steve Jobs showed the way that communication is the key to getting a woman elected in the environment that the USA created.

Men are telling women the truth, they gave us the vote. That is communication. MEN ARE TALKING, and did women listen no. We vote. We hold some offices but we are minority when we equally are born in this country. Men do talk to women. Why are women not listening? Men like Steve Jobs are telling us something about their fears about women in office, and we are still not hearing and comprehending. Once women hear and comprehend, men might share the White House with women elected as president.

 

 

 

 

Wise Women body Builders

dannygarcia

Danny Garcia, Dwayne the Rock Johnson’s business partner and ex-wife, I need to mention Jane Fonda as they are the same people. Both beautiful women that work out with the encouragement and honored by men around them.

I love the captioning of this photo because I am going to write this woman’s issue today happily. Health and beauty is seldom a bill on the congress or senate’s floor but it is a woman’s rights issue tied in with health care.

Why not talk about this how a woman’s body is hers and she has the right to work out the way it makes her feel best about herself. And why do some men not encourage this like they gave us the vote in 1920? I don’t know we lost men. Women lost men somewhere in the caring department about us.

I do not want to be yelled at by a man, get out from that computer and walk. But I do want, here’s some brochures for dance classes, not aerobics for me, but maybe belly dancing that is discreet since I do have stretch marks. And yes I am that naked about wants.

It is like here’s the vote, in 1920, we will see what you women do… and men did that. 100 years later what has women done, not been elected to the White House. Men say we cannot do this for you, like working out. The men folk can only do so much. I have lost a lot of weight, in 2010, I was a huge 286 pounds a XXXL/24 in clothing size, and now I am (I have not weighed myself recently) but my clothing size is a M/L/14 with baggy skin on my arms and thighs. I lost 6 dress sizes. This happened because of getting out of an abusive relationship for me. And that is I was participating in the cycle of violence not liking me.

Jane Fonda in the 1980 promoted exercise and health, Danny Garcia by being herself a champion body builder promote exercise and health. As I said they are the same, but different exercise technics for different body images that make each of them feel good.

Women have the right to be supported by men and not be in the cycle of violence where they are caught up in the codependency of honeymoon, build-up, and the abuse cycle:

Cycle-of-Violence-v3

There is more on this graph than I wrote above, but this is something I am trying to make people aware of, because I was caught in the cycle for a while, and still keeping myself aware of it. The codependency is not romantic. It rips the victim up.

Supporting women is not the cycle of violence, and that is what most men have done since 1920, they do not want to abuse our rights they gave us to vote. All men are not abusers. But some are. And they use the cycle of violence to control a woman into body images that are not what the woman would love to be.

Jane Fonda and Danny Garcia might not be women in co-dependent relationships, but they might have been exposed due to others and their line of work. I am happy to use both in this article to encourage men to continue to not abuse women, and start not feeling scared about supporting women voters. They did in 1920, have the confidence and the lack of fear giving all women the right to vote. This demonstrated that those men were very masculine and confident in their own maleness. A woman could not force them into a cycle of violence also. Those men were not co-dependent. And that is where I want to take this today. Women have the right to be women body builders and not be abused into obesity.

jane fonda 10 Jane Fonda

 

 

 

 

Janet Jackson I apologize Malfunction is accident and I want kid twitter

rs_1024x1024-170414182229-1024_Janet-Eissa-Twitter_kg_041417

Janet Jackson, a new mother and adult artist, is having media today about the Superbowl incident where a malfunction happened on stage that exposed her. Just like her brother Michael Jackson having a public accident years before, both were changed forever after the accidents.

The photo above is Ms. Jackson and her new son Eissa Al Mana. I highly doubt the baby boy is reading twitter today, his mom might and some of the comments I did read over on Justin Timberlake’s thread were alarming. The malfunction is a political issue about exposure of women’s body parts during a public event where children are in attendance.

I AM DEMANDING KID TWITTER.

That is enough, I am an adult entertainer and political article writer. Since the malfunction accident is political in nature, it should be on adult twitter. And I was looking at adult twitter. Earlier today I saw children dancing to one of Justin Timberlake’s children friendly songs. I also saw a stripper talking about porn.

The icing on the cake is the Janet Jackson political story. It is a woman’s rights issue. She has a right to have this political story talking about censorship. So does Justin Timberlake. I have the to right to write about my adult political stuff. But children are exposed on twitter.

I am not stopping my political writing, neither is Justin Timberlake stopping his adult parts of his career to cater to children. A responsible business Twitter needs to acknowledge this.

Kids twitter would bring in more revenue anyway, so I don’t see a problem with this. Kids Netflix gets some add revenue right? From subscribers at least. And I know my children going on Kid Netflix are not being exposed to rated R material, let alone NC-17 material.

Janet Jackson is an adult material creator, but she now has her beautiful son, what if she wants some children’s material on her twitter, but this story exposes children to her adult material before parents are ready for that exposure? It is twitter’s responsibility as a business to provide a safe environment for everybody’s children.

I am sorry Ms. Jackson for using you again, what happened was an accident, and accidents sadly happen. I hope you and Eissa are doing well. Thank you.

Fear based system: Innocent until proven guilty

trump

Innocent until proven guilty creates a fear based system, you are afraid for personal belongings, personal space, and family members. A crime happens and then what? The authorities take over and maybe the person will be found guilty according to a court of law.

I am not saying change any of that, but to get women or the right person involved in politics we have to understand if YOU ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, some people FEAR THIS, the innocent especially. The guilty learn to USE THIS TO THEIR ADVANTAGE.

If the guilty get caught and are found guilty it seems our system works. Especially with the right funding.

I am an American and I do not want to change our system at all, because it is a creative system that creates jobs, inventions, and money. Maybe we need to explain why a fear based system has excluded women from the highest office of the land then? Right this is women’s right? She has the right to run for office in a fear based system and win.

It is such a lie what I am writing, but since I have no credibility I am writing all the bullshit I want. I am woman, female, girly girl. And I want a woman in the white house. Spoil me right, nope I’m dirt poor and want to deconstruct women’s politics to a point where I can get women elected, and elevate men at the same time. TOTAL BS, a woman elevating men and women at the same time. I have god complex right?

Innocent until proven guilty is exclusive to women in politics not inclusive.

Guilty until proven innocent countries have more women Prime Ministers. WHY IS THIS?  Men feel the state has protected the woman and the woman’s body. The guilty man went to jail for the sex crime or crime against a woman in a man’s family. The state is the vigilantly. Even if the man is innocent and framed he’s guilty and paying the price in guilty until proven innocent countries.

As an American woman I say this is wrong, because no innocent person should rot for another man’s crime. So let the innocent be found by having innocent until proven guilty. I think that is easier.

Then I run into the truth, some men are using our system and they are guilty. That sets up the fear that leads to mostly men in office deciding on laws without a woman’s input. “I have a gun, get off my property, because I am the law.” Comes to mind. The woman NEVER is known to wake up at midnight to check for the intruder, the man protects his family. Get it.

SO the family in the USA has a man head of household because he will hold that gun and protect his family. The President of the USA is the man. NO woman can protect her family, and that is the USA.

I need to think, I love our system and will not change it. Will we have a first gentleman get up in the middle of the night with the gun to protect his home, while the President makes the final decisions on curtains in the oval office as a more important decision because she’s female?

The fear based system creates very brave people – Jesus Christ