Lawful Prostitution

snake-cup-white-background-85756615

Lawful Prostitution is a simple act of going to the hall of records getting a license and then getting married. It is that simple. Then you are in a tax situation, if you are not in love and you just want cohabitation.

Prostitution is not legal in most states, it is legal in Nevada, it is legal in the country of Canada but Canada arrests Johns (clients), there are other countries where it is lawful, I am looking it up. But what if an escort is a lawful wife and nobody knows of the contractual agreement used to create that lawful prostitute?

What if this actually is happening in reality? And nobody is speaking about it?

This is not a book it is nothing, just ideas flowing for Women’s Rights, which means going beyond women, and seeing what women actually accomplish. TO see where leaders might have overlooked that men are involved with for women’s rights. Is it a woman’s right to prostitute her body?

Is it right to have legal prostitution that nobody looks at? Is it right for children to come into the world during a lawful prostitution situation? And how would anybody know the couple decided on being in a lawful prostitution?

What does the state think about a marriage license being bought for immigration? Is that a lawful prostitution? Who is the pimp? Or Madame in a lawful prostitution situation? What about the man who does the same thing sells himself for medical money to help parents overseas? Is that a lawful prostitute as well?

I do not have the answers to these questions, but I do have the questions and I have the knowledge that Yes lawful prostitution has happened using state marriage licenses, but I have no proof.

This is a woman’s right issue that does involve Men, so it is beyond the scope of the current women’s leadership. Don’t touch prostitutes? There are 5 billion prostitutes according to just one web-site I looked up… is that a realistic number?? I don’t think so, but it is there for the seeing. I am not sighting it today.

I have noticed if a woman’s issue involves men, WOMEN’s Leaders do not really touch it. Look at Hillary Clinton, did she really go into prostitution let alone lawful prostitution, and it takes men to complete the transaction if it is a heterosexual sex act. If it is a lesbian sex act then of course prostitution is a completely FEMALE transaction.

A woman has the right to say no to being a prostitute. It is not a requirement for all women to prostitute her body for goods, services and money. But it is a woman’s issue, health issue, children’s issue, and MEN’s.

So Wise Women and Beyond, just went beyond. I am speaking to the men now alone, finding a cold room with nobody answering back. Do men really need sex so badly that they need to purchase a woman? I don’t know. That needs a man to tell me of this. It also needs a man to support keeping prostitution illegal since there last time I checked are 19.4% women between the Congress and Senate of the USA. So men still need to speak up on a critical issue, LAWFUL PROSTITUTION.

I want to keep my opinion on if prostitution should be kept illegal, I do support arresting violent clients and clients that ask for unreasonable accommodations. What are unreasonable accommodations should be decided on by the men and women in congress and the senate. Or by the government of each country.

Ending this, might be what I write from now on, I need to end another article that seems to be never ending topic… a topic to revisit later.

Divorce is new harem Revisted

imagesclock  Harems are old fashion, very conservative, and so not apart of modern American, why am I writing about them again. It is a liberal idea one man and one woman for the rest of your life. Yes monogamy is a liberal idea and not conservation one.

Some might not have heard of, or let alone read http://www.useless-knowledge.com, or even read the article Divorce is the New Harem, so the concept of the article was simple, man conservatively wants multiple women for maximum amount of reproductive success, divorce allows for this publically.

I was wrong about Divorce being apart of the conservative male mindset, it now moves to the liberal male mindset column, which might frighten the herd male who wants all the females to himself with very little sharing.

I thought it was a conservative value divorce, and then having the second and then third family.  You see harem has formed another woman and then possibly another woman with maximum possibilities of reproduction.

The herd is the most conservative sexual value of a male. A herd of horses might have 30 females and 3 males maximum, again read that once if that information changed I do not know. In the herd a fowl would be born, a female had a better chance of staying alive, but the tiny new born sperm producer might not, this is on video numerous times about many different herds and groups like walrus’s. THE MALE CHILD, SPERM PRODUCER, BABY BOY, MIGHT NOT SURVIVE.

The Harem, for humans, is just another form of the herd, and it does the same thing but one, MALES, MEN, SPERM PRODUCERS might survive, human reproduction accomplished with maximum success of passing genes on. The MALE LIVES YES!

Divorce might produce more male and female offspring, by getting another female involved, hoping the first female does not remarry… that is the catch, the first female does not reproduce again and never is touched by another man might be the hope of a divorced male.

So here’s my retraction article, a divorce is not a new harem for the male, it is the start of a Polyamory. A polyamory is a relationship of multiple males and females that has the possibility of new communication about sexual intercourse and reproduction.

A divorce starts a polyamory family.

The male and female might as well bring the new partners into the lives of the home and children right away, this is to discuss the former marriage, problems it had and introduce the new partners Men and Women to one another in a non-hostile emotionless way.

I like polyamory, I am polyamorous, not into polygamy. I am into pansexuality, new term, I might be a lesbian.  These terms are a part of women’s politics. They need exploring by women’s candidates with Man’s support. Because these new families exist, they are divorced but might have just communication problems because a new little one by another man for the woman for example needed to come into the world. Why not come into the  world having two dads with one mom? Polyamory is divorce.

So I apologize to my old readers and new, I was wrong, Divorce is not a new harem for males. It is the start of a new liberal idea for PANSEXUALS, Polyamorous individuals, and women.

 

 

 

Womans rights means Boys Rights

yr-4-boys

Boys rights, women’s rights, boys rights, women’s rights, boys rights, women’s right????

All men are champions, fathers, and voters. Basing women’s rights off of champions, male strong champions, like President Lincoln, a republican champion for women’s rights. Susan B. Anthony, herself, backed President Lincoln first bid for the white house, while she wanted to be apart of the Women’s Loyal League.

Once you think about men being Champions, during 1919, it had to be the men to make the final votes for women to have the right to vote, in the congress and senate.  All those men, the Congress men and the Senators, of that time are Champions for women. A man has to champion a woman’s candidate for president, to get her the votes and the white house.

So boys rights are women’s rights. Rosie O’Donnell’s a children’s bill of rights comes to mind right here…BOYS RIGHTs, before the 18 year old draft and being able to vote. A little BOYS right to want to be a champion, has never been protected.

We have lost the CHAMPION, we lost the hero that is MAN. There are no rights for Little boys.  There is no President Lincoln or house of representatives that would support a woman’s right to vote. Because there is no support for those boys to exist like in the past where champions that are men were raised.

I again will leave this topic hanging. Because I have to write more in depth articles in the future. Sad that a first woman president or more women in congress and senate cannot be created over night.

 

75 million coffins

coffinThere was a serge of births after WW2, everybody knows that women and men decided on family after the win of the war. A birth of 6 children per family happened after 1950, by statistics that I have read, if that is truth I do not know. These new children after WW2 are known as the BABY BOOMERS.

The children grew, Men and Women, and these people are future coffins as of today. The game and money from their deaths have not been collected. Houses Baby Boomers own are not on the market yet for sale, the stock market is bloated with money for insurance payments and retirement funds, and they are not thinking about the generation that just registered to vote. I call the 83 million new voters, we are here now. WAHN.

So I am Generation X, the unknown. The unfaced. The Generation that has jobs but we are not the Generation of the YUPPIEs (baby boomers that finally wanted children 1980 somethings) The WAHN are some Generation X children, but they are also children from, WE NEVER NAMED OUR GENERATION, after the baby boomers. WNNOG.

Brad Pitt is in the WNNOG. If you didn’t know. I am UNKNOWN, that is the X. So the coffins coming for the baby boomers are what is happening leaving a scary problem for the WAHN.

That generation has no leadership the WAHN. No male leadership, and especially no female leadership. Colleges want money from Generation X and WNNOG, for the generation WAHN.

So since WE ARE HERE NOW, are 18 or a little older lets address the particulars of losing the Grandparents or great grandparent of the BABY BOOMERs. I already mentioned the houses, Grandma and Grandpa own. Yes those houses go to mom and pop right. DIRRTY POP right? Get that one, your Dad might know what is happening being an investor watching the markets for the retirement/college fund? That is Dirrty not caring about his son or especially his daughter, pop knows something is going wrong and doing nothing, he’s doing his own thing, hence he’s a Dirrty Pop.

Again the generation of WE ARE HERE NOW has nothing, not even a father that cares about their financial freedom future.

When I was a teen generation X future woman, the market (DOW JONES) was trading at 1900, now the last time I saw the market it was at 23,000. THAT is a problem. Inflation has not really caught up, a Mcdonald’s meal only went up 5 bucks right? From 5 dollars to 10 in the last 30 years. Nope you still can get two Big Mac’s for 5.

Prediction the market will be affected by the deaths of the BABY BOOMERS. No brainer, see I’m stupid, I do not have to be an investor to notice a market glut. What goes up does go down. The first thing when a person dies is dividing and gathering for division of assets. The money in the market for the Baby boomers is one of those assets that might be SOLD because of gathering assets for distribution.

Well at first the prices seem stable, example they get to sell DISNEY at 18! That is a high sales, when they bought Disney for 5. Well, there goes the price as a glut of stocks flood the market say if 1000 baby boomers die that week (I know my numbers are not accurate but you get it).

OH did I mention 75 million deaths are coming with a country only at 320 million in population. 320 minus 75 million… hum not good numbers for men or women. I could be wrong. There might be births that offset the BABY BOOMER DEATHs, but then those births take 30 years to buy a house? Right?

So this is a woman’s site, but I WANT THE MEN TO READ THIS TOO. So that is why it is called Wisdom Women and Beyond… WWAB, the AND BEYOND is for the men.

I will continue to explore the power nothing for the generation We Are Here Now. They have to take power, when generation X and the generation that did not name itself are older. Yes Generation X candidates for women might start speaking, WHEN. Nicki Haley? Is she worried about the population drop and potential reality of the stock market glut being no money eventually for a while? Who is the leader for women? When a family does need money for food and people no longer trust investment… worst case scenario probably will never happen.

75 million coffins… something to think about.

 

 

 

The Journey Begins 2020

Society-Needs-WomenRights

The women’s vote started August 18, 1920 with the 19th amendment to the Bill of Rights, this new site will explore women. Women’s political points of view.

2020 is a project that I wanted to see going by now, a first woman president with the anniversary of the vote, yup I’m a selfish self centered woman very female maybe called girly. Politicians have not done much of anything to focus on the historic anniversary of what I hold dear as a woman. Politicians in my opinion currently have ignored women’s issues and candidates. The women have had to be one of the men.

Voting as a man has been pressured on many women for reproductive reasons, again opinion no political statistics to back this up. Reproductive reasons of being the same as the man but having parts that differ is a topic that will be explored while pushing my agenda of a celebrated anniversary of my right to vote.

The new generation of registered voters that are women are who I want this to reach. These young American woman with no representation at all. A generation that is lost in my opinion.

Why is the new voting woman lost? Because there is a 50 year time spread between the leadership of Gloria Steinem and the ear whispering campaigns of the past.

I am a nobody, I wanted retirement from politics, and I have that. My face unknown as I decided on, but this issue bothers me, so I am writing again. I hope Nancy Pelosi sees this because it is time, 2020 and the first woman president… my hopes.

Good company in a journey makes the way seem shorter. — Izaak Walton