Tag: Exercise

Men are Not Women

menandwomen

There is so much I want to say about this one topic. And others can too, men are simply not women. In 1920, Men gave women the vote. That being said it is like a Christmas gift that was begged for by women for decades since the revolutionary war. Men are just not women.

So begging is woman?  Yes, that is the truth, begging is what it seems to me what women had to do to get to 1920. That is abusive thinking on my part right.

That is cycle of violence thinking? Women begged and men were reluctant to grant a human right to women to own property and to vote? So is the honeymoon over after the vote was given in 1920, are women willing to stop the calm buildup and explode to get back to a honeymoon with men? I don’t want the first woman president to be a gift after women get mad!!!

I don’t want to be in a power struggle with men. I want power sharing. Not a communism because I am a capitalist by admission a long time ago, and I read the Communist Manifesto, by Carl Marx, and it is a concept that simply does not work in practice, when does the supreme dictator step down? To form the democracy? According to the manifesto the dictator sets up the democratic commune and then steps aside. It is a violent way to set up what we have currently, but the USA was not set up by a dictator but by a group of men…a Polyamory.

Our system is a republic, and other systems being elected parliaments work because people are forced or volunteer to step aside. So these systems work in practice, and I with others happily support.

Now I mentioned Polyamory as the way the USA was started, it was a group of men that loved discussing freedoms and not liking zero representation on taxation. That group of men founded this country. Our congress and senate are a true polyamory now, and open non-violent discussions ensue daily about what law needs to be in this home called the USA.

A Polyamory family might be able to get more women into office without abusive communication. Again going back to how women begged for the vote which is truth. There was no open communication, arrests happened on women’s rights leaders, and the cycle of violence happened. It is historic cycle of violence.

While this country was founded on non-violent discussion, the constitutional congress, but had to fight to escape the violence of not being able to have peaceful discussions. And it was violent and bloody escaping a person/country that wanted to control every aspect of the colonies, while the men came from a place/country of semi-peaceful elections to have representation.

Men currently are Great Britain to women, we have some representation but not… Men handed us the taxation representation we wanted but didn’t, the vote with no representation. There should not be a revolution, I don’t want a new country, with what land would women claim, there is no Greek amazon here in the USA. But there is violent abusive political discussion, and I am knowing I am in this political cycle of violence and I want out… I want representation.

 

 

 

 

Monogamy divorce rates: does it lead to cycle of violence or a sign of potential

327269132_Def_LAbout 40% to 50% of married couples in the United States divorce, according to the American Psychological Association. The divorce rate among those who remarry is even higher. – Feb 2, 2018 Google

The chilling truth communication problems in monogamies can lead to divorces. This is differences, the law is what brought the couple together right and the law breaks the couple apart. Communication problems, that some with successful marriages, is what people do not speak on in divorce court. That is the issue of this article.

Does cycle of violence lead to the divorce? In some cases yes. And when this is looked at right, nope this is never looked at, communication. Where to begin?

I am just a political writer with an opinion. But I have studied forms of sexual communication and this is the toughest to write about monogamy communication. I am not a therapist, lawyer, or child advocate. I am just someone that observed in my life experiences that communication in monogamies based on statistics is weak and/or non-existent in 50% of the lawful marriages.

Is the cycle of violence the cause for most divorces? Did the cycle of violence exist before the marriage? Unless there is a licensed therapist all I have are statistics. And maybe those families that are in the cycle of violence communication will get defensive when reading this article.

DomesticViolence_Cycle

This cycle of violence is not in all monogamies, but I have found from observation that it is in some.

Wise Women and Beyond will not be a judge of this, I just want people, women, children and men out of the cycle of violence, which is a cycle of bad communication. If people are in this cycle of violence bad communication how can I hope to get men to support women running for office. How does the country get back to the non-abuse that gave women the vote from willing happy communicative males that were not in a honey-moon period?

If people can pinpoint communication issues they personally have, and I have my own communication issues, I’m far from perfect, rescues into Foster Care can happen faster. Foster Care will be able to speak better to the public and good caregivers will be attracted into the system.

The system at school can see that a child is having speech issues due to speaking from the cycle of violence learned at home, the system can get the child into care faster. Then, a nanny state can be avoided by people in the future, and people can help each other. Isn’t that the goal of social services in the first place? Helping society find less bad communication that leads to abuses of all sorts.

I am not saying monogamies have bad communication all the time, it is just observed.

 

 

 

 

Polyamory does not mean Sexual Freedom

Post-2016OCT-PolyTrueLove

This topic is WWAB or Wise Women and Beyond. How to start talking about voting if I cannot get into your home and get you moved to that ballot box in favor of a candidate that might not be you, but has the same ideas you have? I have to describe different voters and voting groups first, in my mind that works.

So this article is exclusively Polyamory, and the slang is Poly, but I don’t like the slang because I am not writing about Polygamy today. Men might not understand what a Polyamory is, from one person so far that is truth. And if one person holds wrong ideas about a CLOSED FAMILY, then what? A group judged as wrong and immoral?

First Monogamy is a closed family. Closed is obvious, if you are in an open relationship you get to see other people, in a monogamy it is closed you decided with communication to only be with that person. In society that is approved and encouraged through religion and government. Taxes state single or head of house hold with the assumption it is a monogamy.

Second Polyamory is a communicative relationship about life. It will include sex in those adult conversations. It does not mean you have the sexual freedom to abuse someone. A polyamory is a loving relationship with healthy sexual behavior that talks about fetishes and BDSM. Some Polyamous family do not do BDSM because of the open communication, not saying BDSM is not open communication, it is just that people are not into that kind of sexual speaking.

Third, again I want to emphasis, it is a closed relationship that is committed to for decades until death for some. This is like a monogamy, according to monogamy people and what they advertise, which Polyamous people know the truth, monogamy is different and might not be into non-abusive communication about everything including sex, hence the divorce rates are still high in monogamies.

Polyamory’s are not SWINGERS. I need to research swingers because I am not one, I was not interested in learning about that group of adults, which are into being with other adults which seems like an open relationship to me.

This is a voting group. And others might not vote for a polyamorous candidate because of one detail, the sex is not NORMAL? Whatever that means, I’m BDSM, not really a fetish person and I will devote an entire article on fetishs later.

But what if a polygamous person is for funding law enforcement to keep sex offenders off the street because of sex offenders trying to use their group to hide real intentions, like sex traffickers. That person would be on the side of Monogamous people right, but because of one difference that man or woman cannot get the vote. Food for thought.

 

Polygamy no PORN needed: Polyamory where is the orgy???

eminemsuper

Polygamy’s might have orgy’s, might, that I am not researching for this post. A polyamory might have orgy’s, see they are the same concept. I do know without research an orgy if spoken about and consented too a polyamory has them.

Polyamory is called immoral because of the orgy’s of the past. And yes that is insulting to true polyamorist. I am once again Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism. When I was introduced to a polyamorist family, I was enlightened they are same as me, just not into BDSM as what they call themselves. I was delighted about the loving conversation and about consent and love.

First a polyamory family involves women and men, it is not a polygamy. Second the polyamory believes and puts into practice the same rules of sexual conversation as a BDSM person. I kept my BDSM to myself and did state to the woman who is the polyamorist I could be like her, never really speaking on who I am, which means I communicated poorly. I was asked, and told her I was not ready for a commitment in her family. I am still thinking of her loving her in the way I can, and she would say that is true polyamorist. Third a polyamory can lead to children from two men on one woman, so that might seem immoral when both daddies have consented to this and LIVE WITH THE MOTHER.

TWO DADDIES LIVE IN THE SAME HOME AS THE MOTHER.

I am in love with the woman who introduced Polyamory to me, but I am still not ready for the commitment that is needed with her. So I am here explaining that to an audience to explain open sexual communication. Sadly, I do not speak with her any longer because of myself and my own needs.

Consent is the key to all three types of sexual behavior. A polygamy a woman and a man consent. Polyamory a woman and a man consent. BDSM a woman and a man consent and go deeper with specific wording in sexual behavior.

Abusive conversation can happen in all sexual relationships. Polyamory and BDSM address this openly trying to not abuse sexually anybody. I am saying this conversation does not happen in polygamy or monogamies. I have proof in monogamies that might have needed to become polyamory’s, because divorce courts and family courts are full of people wanting no open naked sexual conversation about their sexual needs.

I have a hard time getting people to speak about open communication. Polyamory is not there to set up orgy’s. It is not immoral.

In a polygamy, I wrote porn not needed. That truth might floor people, but where is the man’s need to watch other men have sex. There would be none. That man might have a need to see woman on woman action, but him watching other men in a voyeurism isn’t there.

Polyamorist might not be into orgy’s. But they are into the communication and consent of orgy’s. A polyamorist is not into unconsentual sex. That is an abomination to a polyamorist, like it is an abomination to a BDSM person.

Polyamory is about loving communication, so is BDSM. That loving communication is not just sexual. And that means Polyamory isn’t about voyeurism or orgy’s unless that is completely talked about and consented to in a polyamorous group. So my headline brought people in, it is a woman’s right to chose what she is sexually. And I am going to explore all of this some more.

Polygamy’s might not love a polygamous family, but communication is key to both. And both might exist in a world where they are illegal and I still say keep them illegal, even if I am who I am, perhaps a polyamous person after all.

 

Wise Women body Builders

dannygarcia

Danny Garcia, Dwayne the Rock Johnson’s business partner and ex-wife, I need to mention Jane Fonda as they are the same people. Both beautiful women that work out with the encouragement and honored by men around them.

I love the captioning of this photo because I am going to write this woman’s issue today happily. Health and beauty is seldom a bill on the congress or senate’s floor but it is a woman’s rights issue tied in with health care.

Why not talk about this how a woman’s body is hers and she has the right to work out the way it makes her feel best about herself. And why do some men not encourage this like they gave us the vote in 1920? I don’t know we lost men. Women lost men somewhere in the caring department about us.

I do not want to be yelled at by a man, get out from that computer and walk. But I do want, here’s some brochures for dance classes, not aerobics for me, but maybe belly dancing that is discreet since I do have stretch marks. And yes I am that naked about wants.

It is like here’s the vote, in 1920, we will see what you women do… and men did that. 100 years later what has women done, not been elected to the White House. Men say we cannot do this for you, like working out. The men folk can only do so much. I have lost a lot of weight, in 2010, I was a huge 286 pounds a XXXL/24 in clothing size, and now I am (I have not weighed myself recently) but my clothing size is a M/L/14 with baggy skin on my arms and thighs. I lost 6 dress sizes. This happened because of getting out of an abusive relationship for me. And that is I was participating in the cycle of violence not liking me.

Jane Fonda in the 1980 promoted exercise and health, Danny Garcia by being herself a champion body builder promote exercise and health. As I said they are the same, but different exercise technics for different body images that make each of them feel good.

Women have the right to be supported by men and not be in the cycle of violence where they are caught up in the codependency of honeymoon, build-up, and the abuse cycle:

Cycle-of-Violence-v3

There is more on this graph than I wrote above, but this is something I am trying to make people aware of, because I was caught in the cycle for a while, and still keeping myself aware of it. The codependency is not romantic. It rips the victim up.

Supporting women is not the cycle of violence, and that is what most men have done since 1920, they do not want to abuse our rights they gave us to vote. All men are not abusers. But some are. And they use the cycle of violence to control a woman into body images that are not what the woman would love to be.

Jane Fonda and Danny Garcia might not be women in co-dependent relationships, but they might have been exposed due to others and their line of work. I am happy to use both in this article to encourage men to continue to not abuse women, and start not feeling scared about supporting women voters. They did in 1920, have the confidence and the lack of fear giving all women the right to vote. This demonstrated that those men were very masculine and confident in their own maleness. A woman could not force them into a cycle of violence also. Those men were not co-dependent. And that is where I want to take this today. Women have the right to be women body builders and not be abused into obesity.

jane fonda 10 Jane Fonda