Tag: Lesbian

Slave birthing bus

Slave_ship

I am a poor person that needs a time out, and everybody in my home is pissed off, so taking the time out first.

Rosa Parks eat your heart out, do you sit in the front of the bus before you see the bunk bed, or do you pass it like I did, and stare at a bunk bed in the middle of the bus. This is public transport, not a musician or groups tour bus.

I know there is a good reason for bunk beds with rails so children do not fall out on Anchorage Alaska public transportation, one excuse that comes to mind a potential new ambulance?? I am not going to look up the reason, this is my reaction. I know the bus schedule is not an over night long range schedule. And where do you put a wheel chair on that bus, the bunk bed was right where normally there would be a wheel chair break area for someone with a disability that required that kind of loving assistance from public transportation.

Bunk Bed in the middle of the bus. I felt abused, and the above picture is why. Public transportation is used by everybody, EVERYBODY of Every color. It is for a rainbow of people, I know I’m the one with the issue. I know I’m the person seeing this, nobody else because guess what that bus has been around I am assuming for years in the Anchorage Alaska fleet of public transportation busses. I don’t know if I can board a bus here in Alaska again, and I might have to due to my poverty.

I was a kid in a bunk bed so why does the bunk bed on a public day transportation for short term transport bother me. Here’s why?

They used bunk beds to transport slaves chaining them down to the beds, this is public transportation, once again owners of slave ships used bunkbeds to transport slaves to market. Anchorage Alaska has a good public transportation system that does not need to be shut down but one bus needs to be altered, because I don’t want to be abused again. I am thinking other might not as well, if they knew the truth. And I was on my way to do a job, well interview for one, I was being transported to get my wage slave… okay remember I’m the one with the issue here. Right? It is just me with this issue???

It is Taboo to Communicate Well

euangeorgecrowley2small

I do not know how Culture Club with Boy George is Taboo, this is the beginning of a series of article on taboo conversations. That the way we speak to each other can be taboo. And it isn’t just on taboo topic matters.

I was looking for a picture for this taboo article, one was a TV show named Taboo, sick painting of naked adults, one a naked woman masturbating and then I ran into Boy George, and went how is he Taboo. I grew up singing loudly and badly to one culture club hit song, Chameleon.

He’s not taboo. He’s not a taboo topic to speak of, and yes he is a gay man. So a man being gay on a google search is the search word in images Taboo, is taboo. Boy George is the image of Taboo. See I’m in shock.

So is it a taboo topic to speak on this, well if you do not know how do you know how society feels about somebody. I know the search is because of a title to an article. So indexing, yes the indexing was because of a original Broadway show Taboo 2003. I really never heard of that, so did I self abuse? By thinking this is terrible a favorite singer is taboo? Might be… guess what that is a taboo topic.

It was silly of me to think Boy George Taboo how terrible, the Taboo show isn’t Taboo. Was it abusive of the audience to call the show Taboo, yes I know lovable Boy George. The Cycle of violence needs to be applied to what I just did… Honey moon I love Boy George… Build up this cannot be true…. explosion I’m writing about it. Okay see the cycle of violence isn’t so bad right? It happens right?

It is taboo speaking on the cycle of violence, but not taboo to talk about the cycle of water, the sun evaporates, the evaporated water rises forming rain clouds, and then the rain happens to fall from there, and it starts all over again.

I apologize to Boy George because I do not want him abused, I never heard of Taboo the Broadway show.

I do want to continue writing about Taboo topics, and I have one taboo topic is Thorn a tool to stop sexual abuse on children founded by Ashton Kutcher, hardly anybody showed up at the committee meeting when Ashton Kutcher was testifying. There was an audience behind him that saw one to two committee members and no others.  The committee is bigger than four people right?

 

Cycle of Violence: This has to be known and understood

2E5D287700000578-3314824-image-a-32_1447305398397

The cycle of violence if unknown, happens, if known happens. It is why we have a court system and full penitentiaries. A huge national budget for all of it. I think with more people aware of the abuses that can happen and do, we can lighten the court systems load on misdemeanors and get those repetitive felons.

Why I hammer home and sound like a broken record, oh six more years of broken record by the way, because this will not stop, it just started, and even I need to be reminded daily about the cycle of violence.

That awareness might prevent a woman from being raped and murdered when you know the signs she is at risk of being in the cycle of violence with her boyfriend. It also can prevent verbal sexual violence on men and prevent men’s murders.

The cycle of violence is the honeymoon, hey you got flowers, the build up, you did what okay let that go you did what let that go you did what… boom explosions happens right? Then the cycle happens again more flowers? I write about the abuses on men and barely have started to touch on the abuses of women. Both sexes have different abuses they go through, men I think, no proof but observation, it is more verbal abuses that can be sexual that they suffer, women it is more physical, psychological and sexual abuses. Why the difference? Physical differences cause the different forms of abuses on each of the genders.

And because of the physical differences we are not seeing what is happening verbally sexually to men daily. Again the chronic condition of society is blaring. I cannot solve this yet, without taking a man down, which is the last thing I want to do.

What does it mean taking him down? It means stripping him naked and showing him where women attack. Yes his gentiles, and sometimes he isn’t attack for sexual reproduction but he’s attack for status, power, money, and there are other excuses. Again the VERBAL SEXUAL ABUSE is verbal, a simple put down of him, and he’s abused, so why would he want to support women, let alone men who support women, when he is the abuse victim.

The cycle of violence starts at home. And then ends up at the ballot booth. The candidates male and female might not know, that a man might be voting based on how he’s treated by women in this society, but this woman has seen this. 1920 MEN GAVE WOMEN THE VOTE. How does that feel reading that again?

 

Recognizing Abusive Communication can lead to finding Male victims Of sexual verbal and written abuse

punchcd

I write sex stuff all the time, this started at 15 years old after I read my first romantic novel and got hooked. Was there abusive sex language in that novel? Yes. I know bodice ripper is what I was reading according to some people, I called it romantic novel. But the language, yes I read my first soft porn novel at age 14, there will a parent let a child read what I just wrote I hope not.

This is politics, and politics can only go as far as good non-abusive communication can take it. So if a human woman is taught sexually abusive language toward men from a young age, how do we stop the male victim creation.

The creation of the tough, he shows passion by being angry male stereo type, firmly in the heads of many women planted there by women, is abusive to men. And then my inner bugs speaks up, a man I respect, remember I’m gender Female Woman girl, “What if I want to do that, bodice ripper thing?”

The thoughts are to stop verbal sexual abuse of the Male Man boy, and I am failing miserably. I have these stereo types of men in my head, and I am trying to admit those can be generalizations and abuses of men. This is entrenched in novels that women have purchased in the billions, including me for their sexual enjoyment.

Is anger a good thing to draw upon when you are sexual? I don’t think so.

A sexual assault is about power and control. It has nothing to do with sex, or sexual satisfaction of both people.  The person who does the sexual assault wants power and control over another person.

BDSM is about consent and having consensual talked about sex with a partner, and this can lead to good communication with loads of people outside the bedroom. BDSM does have the power for the submissive because it was spoken about and the couple wanted or group wanted a safe word during sexual intercourse or sex play.

So in recognizing that there is entrenched sexual verbal and written abuse that a man endures, how do I find these victims and then find coping mechanisms for them. So far men have acted out a bit… see there is the female abuser… were men actually acting out as being abusive by not listening to women still wanting the vote??? Of course they are not acting out right? But “acting out” is an abuse term you acted out making me… instantly telling women that men are still the aggressor against helping us get the vote for the first woman president or more women in business.

This is going to be difficult, and this was inspired by Thorn, again a tool to help children get away from sexual abusers. Well, I am happy what happened this weekend lead to this. More to come…

We are Human

hot-air-balloon-ride-temecula-1-hour-sunrise-flight_large

Waking this morning was fun, because I wanted to write about natural consequences and then thought about polyamory. Yes, polyamory, which is a loving closed relationship, for adults in the end it raises healthy loving children.

We are going into talk divorce and monogamous communication, I don’t want to talk about monogamous communication, some people find that sensitive like I do. But you cannot get around the FAILURE in monogamous communication that leads to divorces.

This sensitivity to monogamous communication might be my BDSM. Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism is a form of monogamous communication and sexual communication. And it is my preference, but I am a failure at communication in monogamy, so I should talk. Right?

We are human, and monogamous communication is our advertising and media and movie industry and television industry and everyday life. This is pushed on people with out BDSM because BDSM is thought of as a perversion. Yes, safe words that a submissive demands is a perversion. And I need to demand safe words in my life, not just in the bedroom. I think all of us do.

Submissive person is a person who needs safe words, so they have control over a situation.

Dominate person is a person who is the best communicator with listening comprehension.

When a submissive gives the safe word, at any moment during whatever is going on, the dominate hears and stops whatever is happening at that moment to listen. People think that being a submissive is being a slave, that is not truth, that is FETISH SHIT. A submissive is in control of their environment, the dominant is not. The dominant is not a slave to the submissive, again fetish stuff comes to mind.

That is monogamous communication in a controlled sexual manor, but it is found more in polyamory than in monogamy’s because of the judgment that BDSM is a perversion. Some people think, and I am guessing, that BDSM is thought of as an abusive relationship. It is not. It is communicative.

Monogamy can be abusive relationships. That leads to some divorces. And it is in the communication where the abuse lies. If monogamies were the best communicative relationships, why do we need places like Thorn to catch child sexual abusers? Thorn was founded by the action star Ashton Kutcher, not certain how mentioning the founder helps law enforcement see that Thorn is a tool to help them, and I am going after the electorate to form good non-abusive communication to help stop all abuses, but admitting I am human about that as well.

With 40 To 50 percent of marriages failing, there creates at risk children. Here is where Polyamory might stop at risk children, and open up better communication for adults. Monogamy has an issue, the divorce happens, then remarriage maybe of both people, the child from the first now has two step-parents. Those step-parents know the birth parents both of them, well that is the beginning of polyamory. I know the first marriage failed due to bad sexual communication, but the new marriages work, what if just admitting the couple is polyamorous before the divorce happens?

The couple sits down explaining to one another something is missing, well guess what was missing the new marriage person, that individual is loved by one of the members in the original couple. It doesn’t mean those people are in an open swinging relationship, it was just that someone was missing another adult. NOT another child, but the possibility of one is still there.

When  you know, and it took me time to get to this place, another adult is needed in your relationship, it is rough. I had this issue, and it was something I did bring up in my own marriage, my ex-husband was not receptive to my communication. That is why I should speak, my ex-husband did have an affair, I liked the woman a Peruvian woman he had the affair with I even made her soup when she was sick but… society did get in the way of this and I know that. It did start the end of my marriage, and I did get him into “marriage counseling”. Yes, I was an acquaintance of the woman my ex-husband had a relationship with.

I do not know her any longer and when the affair happened, I was confused going he’s excited about another woman, how do I handle this, and I handled it poorly. But I did not handle it poorly, I treated her with dignity, not really calling her or my ex-husband names, or doing anything stupidly jealous, and that is why I know I might be polyamorous. When I was told and shown pictures of the affair, I just asked, “what do you expect me to do?”

My ex-husband and I as I wrote have communication problems that are not solvable. I know this, so I should not really speak on that any longer, I am in a different place than he is.

A polyamorous person invites the woman into her home and makes soup when the woman is ill.

Society would state that I am a pervert, just by mention good communication skills. BDSM is good communication skills, and polyamorous is the same. But mentioning good communication and something that might help children becomes taboo.

In a polyamory that I was introduced too after the affair, the men take turns caring for the children, no nanny required because that is their family. There are more adults around, not hired help, that care for the children in that polyamory, and I am interested in that kind of communication in the future.

To get to a point where voters are communicating better, with candidates, we have to look at all forms of family and communication. I am walking down a road least traveled, I hope to find men and women open to comprehending where I am coming from and then they lead with their votes to people that want abuses stopped and offenders incarcerated.

Dirt in the eye balls

dirtintheeye.png

Two children in a sandbox, one is a girl the other a little boy, both mothers off talking to each other having a fun time like the children. The little girl starts crying and the little boy tries to make nice, both moms look up and come over rapidly. Both moms grab the children gently and one is about to get scolded, which one do you think.

I love little boys, they are nice sweet and sometimes you do have to scold for violence. I love little girls, they are nice sweet and sometimes you do have to scold for violence. Yes, both but here is the above story, which got scolded, the little boy, while the little girl gets her eyes washed out.

That is the current women’s politics. Yes once again we have 19.4% women in politics at the centralized government level of the USA. I feel like the women have dirt in the eyeballs, and not seeing what is happening with the men. We preach the statistics but are not seeing the possibility that dirt is in our eyes, and no mommy’s to wash out the dirt.

I don’t know if the dirt in the eyes is an accident. It might be, the little boy might claim it is, that he moved and the dirt flew directly into the eyes of the little girl. 1920 is a gift to women, because no women could run for office at the time. No women held a governors office in any of the states. No woman was able to do much but hold a protest and get arrested for not following the law.

I am going into verbal sexual abuse that I am seeing, maybe I can wash the dirt from my own eyes. As a parent that is what we do anyway, wash the dirt out ourselves or go to the doctor, a little girl cannot wash the dirt from her own eyes. Neither can a little boy.

As an adult I might not like being called a girl, but I call myself that sometimes, like men might call themselves boy. As someone that might call herself a girl, I am seeing that men are verbally sexually abused, was this how women got the vote. After 80 years of protesting, if abuse was the end result to get the vote from the men that would mean the men gave us a toy and then threw the dirt in the eyes. Where was the toy in the upper scenario? It was not there, and the moms did not see it.

Maybe men think voting and law is just toys to play with for women, instead of tools. They gave in, you have it, see women you have candidates, what more do you want!!! I see that, I am hearing that on the media outlets even from women. That means he’s been abused. The man who voted for me to have the vote is being abused verbally in a sexual manner in his mind.

Men, in their minds, are being mentally sexually abused.

What more do you want? Screamed in the Hillary Clinton campaign for presidency. Screamed at Sarah Palin when she ran for Vice President, what more do you want? Men and women who love their sons and fathers and husbands screaming…

Okay, I know where to go, cycle of violence and time outs. How long of a time out is needed before healthy non-abusive debate begins…and voting is not thought of as a toy for women by men.

Men, in this country and around the world have been verbally sexually abused by their women, and some by men, to get them to what give women the vote??? Abused to a point where communication has been broken down to failure.

Time for my Handcuffs: The verbally sexually abused MAN

stock-photo-close-up-arrested-woman-handcuffed-hands-at-the-back-prisoner-or-arrested-terrorist-hacker-1147341092

Verbal sexual abuse of men has and still happens, and this sad truth is in our vocabulary. Calling a man “Peeping Tom” when he never looked in the first place,  the man might not have been a Peeping Tom, as I wrote in the last article, but that can cause a man to look into his self worth just with those words. These men are not raped but locked into stereo types and not able to leave them, women have done this to men. And maybe men have done this to men also.

My electorate is male and female, both sides vote, and men gave that right to women in 1920. Men still gave women the right to vote.

There is verbal abuse on men who dress in drag, he’s gay, and they have to take it. There is verbal abuse if a man wears drag and he isn’t gay. There is verbal abuse if a man doesn’t go after a woman the “guys and gals” think that man should go after. There is verbal abuse if a man stays with an ABUSIVE WOMAN, or people think he’s with an abusive woman. If a man wants to be celibate, or abstinence only there is verbal abuses a man endures. There is verbal abuse if he stays with a good woman. There is verbal abuse if he cheats, there is verbal abuse if he doesn’t cheat.

All these verbal abuses are sexual in nature, hence verbal sexual abuse.

Every abuse that is verbal on a man is SEXUAL IN NATURE, hence verbal sexual abuse.

The cycle of violence within just “joking around”,  we all live on this planet, and again I want to talk about how this affects politics and elections.

“Be a MAN.” Is something that I’ve heard said and I have said. That can be perceived as verbal sexual abuse. And that affects elections, in positive and/or negative ways.

How do you stop everyday joking around or actual verbal sexual violence on a man? I don’t want to really stop joking around here. I do want to stop ANY AND ALL verbal sexual violence on men. But if we do not acknowledge a global chronic issue, there is no chance for PEACE ON EARTH, GOOD WILL TO MEN AND WOMEN.

Again I am not perfect, get the handcuffs out police department, because I have issues. I have these speech issues, and in the moment catching them is not easy. I as a woman have probably stated the wrong thing. What I said could be joking around, but I think this has cost women whole elections. I know I am right.

So how do I get men to see what I am seeing. LOOOK LOOOK LOOK!!!!!! I am shouting. I see this, do they see? Nope, a lot of verbally sexually abused men might not be able to look up and see what a woman is seeing in the cycle of violence that they are involved in. And I am not going to throw feather pillows at this issue, so how to solve it? I hope it happens so I can joke around and not be abusive.

I want to empower men to vote for the best candidate, even if she is a woman.

 

Polygamy no PORN needed: Polyamory where is the orgy???

eminemsuper

Polygamy’s might have orgy’s, might, that I am not researching for this post. A polyamory might have orgy’s, see they are the same concept. I do know without research an orgy if spoken about and consented too a polyamory has them.

Polyamory is called immoral because of the orgy’s of the past. And yes that is insulting to true polyamorist. I am once again Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism. When I was introduced to a polyamorist family, I was enlightened they are same as me, just not into BDSM as what they call themselves. I was delighted about the loving conversation and about consent and love.

First a polyamory family involves women and men, it is not a polygamy. Second the polyamory believes and puts into practice the same rules of sexual conversation as a BDSM person. I kept my BDSM to myself and did state to the woman who is the polyamorist I could be like her, never really speaking on who I am, which means I communicated poorly. I was asked, and told her I was not ready for a commitment in her family. I am still thinking of her loving her in the way I can, and she would say that is true polyamorist. Third a polyamory can lead to children from two men on one woman, so that might seem immoral when both daddies have consented to this and LIVE WITH THE MOTHER.

TWO DADDIES LIVE IN THE SAME HOME AS THE MOTHER.

I am in love with the woman who introduced Polyamory to me, but I am still not ready for the commitment that is needed with her. So I am here explaining that to an audience to explain open sexual communication. Sadly, I do not speak with her any longer because of myself and my own needs.

Consent is the key to all three types of sexual behavior. A polygamy a woman and a man consent. Polyamory a woman and a man consent. BDSM a woman and a man consent and go deeper with specific wording in sexual behavior.

Abusive conversation can happen in all sexual relationships. Polyamory and BDSM address this openly trying to not abuse sexually anybody. I am saying this conversation does not happen in polygamy or monogamies. I have proof in monogamies that might have needed to become polyamory’s, because divorce courts and family courts are full of people wanting no open naked sexual conversation about their sexual needs.

I have a hard time getting people to speak about open communication. Polyamory is not there to set up orgy’s. It is not immoral.

In a polygamy, I wrote porn not needed. That truth might floor people, but where is the man’s need to watch other men have sex. There would be none. That man might have a need to see woman on woman action, but him watching other men in a voyeurism isn’t there.

Polyamorist might not be into orgy’s. But they are into the communication and consent of orgy’s. A polyamorist is not into unconsentual sex. That is an abomination to a polyamorist, like it is an abomination to a BDSM person.

Polyamory is about loving communication, so is BDSM. That loving communication is not just sexual. And that means Polyamory isn’t about voyeurism or orgy’s unless that is completely talked about and consented to in a polyamorous group. So my headline brought people in, it is a woman’s right to chose what she is sexually. And I am going to explore all of this some more.

Polygamy’s might not love a polygamous family, but communication is key to both. And both might exist in a world where they are illegal and I still say keep them illegal, even if I am who I am, perhaps a polyamous person after all.

 

Divorce is new harem Revisted

imagesclock  Harems are old fashion, very conservative, and so not apart of modern American, why am I writing about them again. It is a liberal idea one man and one woman for the rest of your life. Yes monogamy is a liberal idea and not conservation one.

Some might not have heard of, or let alone read http://www.useless-knowledge.com, or even read the article Divorce is the New Harem, so the concept of the article was simple, man conservatively wants multiple women for maximum amount of reproductive success, divorce allows for this publically.

I was wrong about Divorce being apart of the conservative male mindset, it now moves to the liberal male mindset column, which might frighten the herd male who wants all the females to himself with very little sharing.

I thought it was a conservative value divorce, and then having the second and then third family.  You see harem has formed another woman and then possibly another woman with maximum possibilities of reproduction.

The herd is the most conservative sexual value of a male. A herd of horses might have 30 females and 3 males maximum, again read that once if that information changed I do not know. In the herd a fowl would be born, a female had a better chance of staying alive, but the tiny new born sperm producer might not, this is on video numerous times about many different herds and groups like walrus’s. THE MALE CHILD, SPERM PRODUCER, BABY BOY, MIGHT NOT SURVIVE.

The Harem, for humans, is just another form of the herd, and it does the same thing but one, MALES, MEN, SPERM PRODUCERS might survive, human reproduction accomplished with maximum success of passing genes on. The MALE LIVES YES!

Divorce might produce more male and female offspring, by getting another female involved, hoping the first female does not remarry… that is the catch, the first female does not reproduce again and never is touched by another man might be the hope of a divorced male.

So here’s my retraction article, a divorce is not a new harem for the male, it is the start of a Polyamory. A polyamory is a relationship of multiple males and females that has the possibility of new communication about sexual intercourse and reproduction.

A divorce starts a polyamory family.

The male and female might as well bring the new partners into the lives of the home and children right away, this is to discuss the former marriage, problems it had and introduce the new partners Men and Women to one another in a non-hostile emotionless way.

I like polyamory, I am polyamorous, not into polygamy. I am into pansexuality, new term, I might be a lesbian.  These terms are a part of women’s politics. They need exploring by women’s candidates with Man’s support. Because these new families exist, they are divorced but might have just communication problems because a new little one by another man for the woman for example needed to come into the world. Why not come into the  world having two dads with one mom? Polyamory is divorce.

So I apologize to my old readers and new, I was wrong, Divorce is not a new harem for males. It is the start of a new liberal idea for PANSEXUALS, Polyamorous individuals, and women.