Cycle of Violence within Politics

This tool is needed THORN it needs your help, DONATE to help stop child sexual abuse.

The-crucifixion-in-The-Life-of-Brian-1290006

Mrs. Bill Clinton gave me this idea and I wanted this so badly, I got this idea from thinking about her and watching her speak in the past. I got this idea from writing about them as a married couple. That the cycle of violence is on her and her husband, all they wanted to do was discuss laws and figure out what works in this country.

The crucifixion was about political speech. What do you think Jesus Christ was doing? He was walking around giving his political opinion without running for office. And he never had the vote for a Roman senator for his region of life. Nor did Jesus Christ have the ability to shape the laws of the land without giving his opinion openly. Which he did give his opinions to the point of a conviction with the death penalty.

The luxury about the Clinton’s is that they have the right to run for office, they have the right to their political opinion without the fear of violence against their bodies. That law is in  place to protect them, but the cycle of violent political speech continues even in this modern day.

Hillary Clinton could be crucified just for one bad political decision, that we put her in office to make. Her political future could die based on that. She risked her future and her families future to have that ability in the first place to make that bad decision. Prison can be a fate of an American politician, and it seems rare, right now, but it is the truth.

It was not extreme speech that places people in the cycle of violence in politics today, it is simply talking about preferences now from the preference of trees in a parking lot, to speaking of war to defend the country to protect resources of people and property, that political speech can lead to rocks in windows or threats to families. That is the cycle of violence.

The give give that was suggested is where political speech has to happen, but how when people want to force their own will and not hearing out how their will HURTS MANY!!!

Mrs. Clinton does not want many to be hurt, but she does want a give and take, you do this this reward happens, you do that the correctional facility is for you penalty. Budgets are the same way, you do this the money is there for you, you do that the correctional facility is there as a penalty. Give give is that simple, it takes away the threats of violence.

Mrs. Clinton is the best example for this blog post, because she has gone through so much politically, she is indeed like Jesus Christ. I will go over her record later, I am betting some already know what I can praise her for, just like Jesus Christ.

 

 

Polyamory Vs Polygamy

drewpolygamy

This is the Brown family above, and they are a family trying to explain the most conservative family created: polygamy. The polygamy can be found in the wild as the best form of reproduction, if males are dying at birth, which they do. In man the males are not dying but the oldest form of reproduction family still lives and is enjoyed.

If a man like Mr. Brown has problem being a dominant male who knows. The threat to him is starting to be created, Polyamory. Where another adult male would be living amongst his, Mr. Brown’s females, in the same household, that male is not his son. And it is for sexual purposes. The perception is that both males would be polygamous, but they are not they are in a relationship with each other as well as the woman, just another form of family but VERY Liberal.

Back to the conservative Mr. Brown, the highest most conservative man has to fight for his right with his women just for acceptance. I say, my opinion only, keep what he is doing ILLEGAL. There is now gay marriage where sister wives can marry for purposes of tax breaks, and that would show in a polygamy what I’ve seen in Big Love and I might have watched one or two episodes of Mr. Brown’s TV show, the women marrying a woman would show the family that Mr. Brown wants. Then they stay with him of course.

But there is no Big Love for Mr. Brown’s sons, they have to move out eventually, because they are threats sexually to Mr. Brown’s other wives not their mothers. So here is my suggestion, some liberal value comes in, and Mr. Brown’s sons can become a Polyamory.

I’ll explain. The threat of a full grown male is why polygamys do thrive. These men want more than one woman, because of various reasons. These males use the females need for one male to their reproductive advantage, and lets face it, it is best for children that stability is gained in a relationship, so some females seek out a polygamy for just that. Sometimes monogamy’s do not seem stable enough to raise children in.

Communication is the key to having another full grown male living within a polygamy setting. Polyamory is just that, a group of men and women living in the same home. Mr. Brown would have to open his sexual communication amongst his wives, and with his son, if his son wanted to stay in the home, Mr. Brown would have to lay down strict boundaries. If his son brings in more women that communication has to be used to create a more tight family unit.

This communication is encouraged in Polyamories, but when I watched programs like Big Love and Mr. Browns show (one to two episodes) I did not see the open communication. Polyamory is a communication relationship.

Going from conservative Polygamy, to liberal Polyamory, the only difference is communication and number of males involved. In a polygamy there is one male involved. IN a polyamory more than one is required of males, both have unlimited females.

Both can stay illegal now with the advent of gay marriage being legal, each couple gets tax breaks. Yes firecodes for occupancy need to be revisited for both kinds of families.

I used Mr.Brown’s photo for a famous polygamy, not to be bigoted, I’m into the idea of polyamory, and for me that works. It helps males have more than one female, but it helps females that need other males around.

I need to explored the con’s vs the pro’s in a later article, this is getting too wordy.  This is a woman’s rights issue seldom looked at, and as I said this liberal would love to see polygamy’s stay illegal.

I want to apologize to the Brown family for this article and I hope to use them again, I did not vilify you, but I am stating fact, you are the most conservative, and I am liberal.