Rainbow Coalition: Rights of women my headline is deceptive

votersrainbowpushHuman rights and the ability to save humanity, core values of the Rainbow Coalition. AND this value is international from Canada to Australia. That is the broadest coolest thing ever read, and it is for a rainbow of peoples.

Men gave women the vote in 1920. They needed a Rainbow Coalition then.

Innocent until proven guilty a diamond in my mind is protected by the Rainbow Coalition and they pay to help innocent men that were framed to get out of prison with no record.

Running for office is what the Rainbow Push Coalition organization has helped people do, and I am hoping the organization can help this little woman’s rights blog get those same goals accomplished, just with more women in mind. I know the Rainbow Coalition candidates are women and men.

So here is what I am going to say, woman’s right and human rights are the SAME CONCEPT. Human rights is equal pay for an equal days work. Doesn’t matter color, immigration status or sex. It is a human right to have a livable wage.

Since it is a human right, why are men afraid. In 1920 there was no fears about women getting the vote. The 19th amendment granted that human right. A woman of any color could go to the ballot box and vote. The history of voter suppression happened and still happens… I also think it is a history of candidate suppression, that the most capable candidate is not running. I hope the Rainbow Push Coalition does acknowledge this.
Candidate suppression is simple. A confident man full of ideas and guts wants to run, first the family puts him down, if he gets past that then his own friends put him down, only a few get encouraged. And maybe that is why in some elections even today there is still one color, white. Candidate suppression is not a color blind crime.

The country needs candidates. From every walk of life, not just attorneys. Women are apart of the candidate suppression, maybe some women are the family members putting down someone that wants the media to run for office. I need those women to put their own stuff aside and encourage the candidate that wants to run that is their family member.

I will write more on the Rainbow Coalition with more research. Today I wanted Candidate suppression written about, and I did it.

.

Polyamory does not mean Sexual Freedom

Post-2016OCT-PolyTrueLove

This topic is WWAB or Wise Women and Beyond. How to start talking about voting if I cannot get into your home and get you moved to that ballot box in favor of a candidate that might not be you, but has the same ideas you have? I have to describe different voters and voting groups first, in my mind that works.

So this article is exclusively Polyamory, and the slang is Poly, but I don’t like the slang because I am not writing about Polygamy today. Men might not understand what a Polyamory is, from one person so far that is truth. And if one person holds wrong ideas about a CLOSED FAMILY, then what? A group judged as wrong and immoral?

First Monogamy is a closed family. Closed is obvious, if you are in an open relationship you get to see other people, in a monogamy it is closed you decided with communication to only be with that person. In society that is approved and encouraged through religion and government. Taxes state single or head of house hold with the assumption it is a monogamy.

Second Polyamory is a communicative relationship about life. It will include sex in those adult conversations. It does not mean you have the sexual freedom to abuse someone. A polyamory is a loving relationship with healthy sexual behavior that talks about fetishes and BDSM. Some Polyamous family do not do BDSM because of the open communication, not saying BDSM is not open communication, it is just that people are not into that kind of sexual speaking.

Third, again I want to emphasis, it is a closed relationship that is committed to for decades until death for some. This is like a monogamy, according to monogamy people and what they advertise, which Polyamous people know the truth, monogamy is different and might not be into non-abusive communication about everything including sex, hence the divorce rates are still high in monogamies.

Polyamory’s are not SWINGERS. I need to research swingers because I am not one, I was not interested in learning about that group of adults, which are into being with other adults which seems like an open relationship to me.

This is a voting group. And others might not vote for a polyamorous candidate because of one detail, the sex is not NORMAL? Whatever that means, I’m BDSM, not really a fetish person and I will devote an entire article on fetishs later.

But what if a polygamous person is for funding law enforcement to keep sex offenders off the street because of sex offenders trying to use their group to hide real intentions, like sex traffickers. That person would be on the side of Monogamous people right, but because of one difference that man or woman cannot get the vote. Food for thought.

 

Polygamy no PORN needed: Polyamory where is the orgy???

eminemsuper

Polygamy’s might have orgy’s, might, that I am not researching for this post. A polyamory might have orgy’s, see they are the same concept. I do know without research an orgy if spoken about and consented too a polyamory has them.

Polyamory is called immoral because of the orgy’s of the past. And yes that is insulting to true polyamorist. I am once again Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism. When I was introduced to a polyamorist family, I was enlightened they are same as me, just not into BDSM as what they call themselves. I was delighted about the loving conversation and about consent and love.

First a polyamory family involves women and men, it is not a polygamy. Second the polyamory believes and puts into practice the same rules of sexual conversation as a BDSM person. I kept my BDSM to myself and did state to the woman who is the polyamorist I could be like her, never really speaking on who I am, which means I communicated poorly. I was asked, and told her I was not ready for a commitment in her family. I am still thinking of her loving her in the way I can, and she would say that is true polyamorist. Third a polyamory can lead to children from two men on one woman, so that might seem immoral when both daddies have consented to this and LIVE WITH THE MOTHER.

TWO DADDIES LIVE IN THE SAME HOME AS THE MOTHER.

I am in love with the woman who introduced Polyamory to me, but I am still not ready for the commitment that is needed with her. So I am here explaining that to an audience to explain open sexual communication. Sadly, I do not speak with her any longer because of myself and my own needs.

Consent is the key to all three types of sexual behavior. A polygamy a woman and a man consent. Polyamory a woman and a man consent. BDSM a woman and a man consent and go deeper with specific wording in sexual behavior.

Abusive conversation can happen in all sexual relationships. Polyamory and BDSM address this openly trying to not abuse sexually anybody. I am saying this conversation does not happen in polygamy or monogamies. I have proof in monogamies that might have needed to become polyamory’s, because divorce courts and family courts are full of people wanting no open naked sexual conversation about their sexual needs.

I have a hard time getting people to speak about open communication. Polyamory is not there to set up orgy’s. It is not immoral.

In a polygamy, I wrote porn not needed. That truth might floor people, but where is the man’s need to watch other men have sex. There would be none. That man might have a need to see woman on woman action, but him watching other men in a voyeurism isn’t there.

Polyamorist might not be into orgy’s. But they are into the communication and consent of orgy’s. A polyamorist is not into unconsentual sex. That is an abomination to a polyamorist, like it is an abomination to a BDSM person.

Polyamory is about loving communication, so is BDSM. That loving communication is not just sexual. And that means Polyamory isn’t about voyeurism or orgy’s unless that is completely talked about and consented to in a polyamorous group. So my headline brought people in, it is a woman’s right to chose what she is sexually. And I am going to explore all of this some more.

Polygamy’s might not love a polygamous family, but communication is key to both. And both might exist in a world where they are illegal and I still say keep them illegal, even if I am who I am, perhaps a polyamous person after all.

 

Wise Women body Builders

dannygarcia

Danny Garcia, Dwayne the Rock Johnson’s business partner and ex-wife, I need to mention Jane Fonda as they are the same people. Both beautiful women that work out with the encouragement and honored by men around them.

I love the captioning of this photo because I am going to write this woman’s issue today happily. Health and beauty is seldom a bill on the congress or senate’s floor but it is a woman’s rights issue tied in with health care.

Why not talk about this how a woman’s body is hers and she has the right to work out the way it makes her feel best about herself. And why do some men not encourage this like they gave us the vote in 1920? I don’t know we lost men. Women lost men somewhere in the caring department about us.

I do not want to be yelled at by a man, get out from that computer and walk. But I do want, here’s some brochures for dance classes, not aerobics for me, but maybe belly dancing that is discreet since I do have stretch marks. And yes I am that naked about wants.

It is like here’s the vote, in 1920, we will see what you women do… and men did that. 100 years later what has women done, not been elected to the White House. Men say we cannot do this for you, like working out. The men folk can only do so much. I have lost a lot of weight, in 2010, I was a huge 286 pounds a XXXL/24 in clothing size, and now I am (I have not weighed myself recently) but my clothing size is a M/L/14 with baggy skin on my arms and thighs. I lost 6 dress sizes. This happened because of getting out of an abusive relationship for me. And that is I was participating in the cycle of violence not liking me.

Jane Fonda in the 1980 promoted exercise and health, Danny Garcia by being herself a champion body builder promote exercise and health. As I said they are the same, but different exercise technics for different body images that make each of them feel good.

Women have the right to be supported by men and not be in the cycle of violence where they are caught up in the codependency of honeymoon, build-up, and the abuse cycle:

Cycle-of-Violence-v3

There is more on this graph than I wrote above, but this is something I am trying to make people aware of, because I was caught in the cycle for a while, and still keeping myself aware of it. The codependency is not romantic. It rips the victim up.

Supporting women is not the cycle of violence, and that is what most men have done since 1920, they do not want to abuse our rights they gave us to vote. All men are not abusers. But some are. And they use the cycle of violence to control a woman into body images that are not what the woman would love to be.

Jane Fonda and Danny Garcia might not be women in co-dependent relationships, but they might have been exposed due to others and their line of work. I am happy to use both in this article to encourage men to continue to not abuse women, and start not feeling scared about supporting women voters. They did in 1920, have the confidence and the lack of fear giving all women the right to vote. This demonstrated that those men were very masculine and confident in their own maleness. A woman could not force them into a cycle of violence also. Those men were not co-dependent. And that is where I want to take this today. Women have the right to be women body builders and not be abused into obesity.

jane fonda 10 Jane Fonda

 

 

 

 

Naked and not wanting his opinion

power

Do I want men to have power over me?

Seems like a normal women’s rights question, and then you find yourself somewhere kidnapped and sex trafficked because you decided to not make or put forward the power of your man’s words.

Do I want to have man’s opinion have power on me?

Advertisers are men. Men run the Congress and Sentate with 19.4% women elected. Men voted for women to have the vote, because men were in power at the time. Men are the most powerful in the fashion industry for centuries maybe millennium. Men have the power over our bodies sometimes by opinion on how we look to them. We let that opinion have power.

So men have power is established. That means I am going down a stupid road. I’m stupid right, like many women’s rights advocates in the past accept 1920. (1920 August  20 the 19th amendment for vote est.)

Why did women go stupid?

Not every women is sex trafficked. But the lack of listening to a man’s opinion has lost elections for women. I don’t like that.

My nudity on line I have used before and it is stripping time. That is Wise Women and Beyond, naked women in the wilderness not protecting themselves from the elements and wanting just that truth. We are naked. What do we do now, just act like the animal we are, or acknowledge that we want the lies that we are not naked under our thoughts?

Man has power because of his naked body. First he does have more muscles in his abdomen area. That power is used as his opinion. His thoughts are how strong is his abdomen. Then he shows power on how many women he has used his abdomen on. Second his power is in his shoulder area because of his more built abdomen. Men are not like women where our power is in our legs, but our legs are not built for sprinting speed, our power in our legs is to hold balance. These power areas go into the man’s mind. Not that it goes to his head to use his body forcefully, and we do have laws to stop men from using their bodies forcefully on women. Women just do not have the physical body to seem powerful to a man.

Women’s bodies being built differently does not mean we are lacking in the same mind power but a woman needs to find where her power lies. Again the word lies, am I really about to lie about the strength in a woman’s pelvic bone area down to her legs to her feet?

I do not want the lie, but I might find it, again being naked online trying to find the right words to move both men and women to be partners at the voting booth and in business.

What if what I just found is the truth but we tell people, no your lying? The truth about women is our bodies change and extra weight is something that never changes, a baby puts stress on bone below the chest area. I know using what we are as the power for use to assert on men… no I’m lying. Where is the truth?

I do not want a man’s opinion, just give me the votes, I am like you. I have the power, just not centered in my abdomen. Just like a man I want to draw from that power and have my opinion and leadership. Yea right, most of the politicians are still men, most of the advertisers men, most of the world wants power from abs and shoulders, not hips and legs.