Cycle of Violence within Politics

This tool is needed THORN it needs your help, DONATE to help stop child sexual abuse.

The-crucifixion-in-The-Life-of-Brian-1290006

Mrs. Bill Clinton gave me this idea and I wanted this so badly, I got this idea from thinking about her and watching her speak in the past. I got this idea from writing about them as a married couple. That the cycle of violence is on her and her husband, all they wanted to do was discuss laws and figure out what works in this country.

The crucifixion was about political speech. What do you think Jesus Christ was doing? He was walking around giving his political opinion without running for office. And he never had the vote for a Roman senator for his region of life. Nor did Jesus Christ have the ability to shape the laws of the land without giving his opinion openly. Which he did give his opinions to the point of a conviction with the death penalty.

The luxury about the Clinton’s is that they have the right to run for office, they have the right to their political opinion without the fear of violence against their bodies. That law is in  place to protect them, but the cycle of violent political speech continues even in this modern day.

Hillary Clinton could be crucified just for one bad political decision, that we put her in office to make. Her political future could die based on that. She risked her future and her families future to have that ability in the first place to make that bad decision. Prison can be a fate of an American politician, and it seems rare, right now, but it is the truth.

It was not extreme speech that places people in the cycle of violence in politics today, it is simply talking about preferences now from the preference of trees in a parking lot, to speaking of war to defend the country to protect resources of people and property, that political speech can lead to rocks in windows or threats to families. That is the cycle of violence.

The give give that was suggested is where political speech has to happen, but how when people want to force their own will and not hearing out how their will HURTS MANY!!!

Mrs. Clinton does not want many to be hurt, but she does want a give and take, you do this this reward happens, you do that the correctional facility is for you penalty. Budgets are the same way, you do this the money is there for you, you do that the correctional facility is there as a penalty. Give give is that simple, it takes away the threats of violence.

Mrs. Clinton is the best example for this blog post, because she has gone through so much politically, she is indeed like Jesus Christ. I will go over her record later, I am betting some already know what I can praise her for, just like Jesus Christ.

 

 

Some Moms are bigots against Homo-men because they are not reproducing: Rainbow Coalition revised, Yes they protect rights of reproducing

LGBT-4

What do mom’s want, some want to be grandmothers, yes I sighted the Rainbow Coalition and I hope to get this right. It ran into too many ideas I wanted out there with very little information.

It is the right of women not to reproduce, and it is the right of a homo-sexual man to not reproduce. And the Rainbow Coalition helps protect those rights.

I’ve seen mothers  mom’s and some white mother’s reject their homo-sexual sons in the  movies, I have not heard or scene it in reality. And I know that means I am either pushing bs from the movies, or I am bullshiting, or I do know the movie writers are writing the truth…

Abusive speaking can happen toward a homosexual man or lesbian woman. The cycle of violence and verbal abuses ensues. I’ve written about abusive speaking some in my last article and how men in this country might have been abused in the cycle of violence to provide the vote. But what if the men abused by denying that right?

Since men have reproductive rights, even homo-sexual men, women have no right to violent speaking toward homo-sexual men of any color. That speech is the cycle of violence that needs to be stopped.

There was a little boy that I read on twitter, well he was not on twitter, it was a news story, he was 9 years old suicide. The bullies at school got to him, when he came out as a boy who is homosexual. His mother knew that boy came out to everybody just finding out who he was as a future adult, his name Jamel Myles. These young bullies from his school were taught hate speech at home and those were mothers. Maybe fathers teaching that cycle of violence speech.

Now here is the scary part, those bullies are at risk children mimicking their parents political points of view in public and school. That lead to a homo-sexual boy killing himself.

Even if the homo-sexual boy perceived persecution, he is a shining light showing others at risk for becoming verbal abusers, perhaps substance abusers or physical abusers. Is there any at school teachers wanting to teach the cycle of violence to students as a prevention, like sex ed is a prevention toward stds. It might help the bullies from becoming statistics at the state penitentiaries.

I think this is food for thought for the Rainbow Coalition, and other political organizations. Preventing the hate speech when it starts with “what is” violent speech classes at school. Using those classes to find at risk students to place them on a better road of financial success.

So are those moms bigots against that child because his sexual preference was to not be reproductive? I guess the movie industry is right, it is happening, maybe people like me are wished on not to see the bigotry.

 

 

 

Rainbow Coalition: Homosexual Rights

RCYK-Logo-Horizontal-01

I wanted something all inclusive for the Rainbow Coalition, so I found their Yellowknife logo and used it for my gay rights post. I am reaching out only to homosexuals in this post, and no other group, but I wanted to point out the Rainbow Coalition does work on rights for everybody. The logo is from Canada, making the Rainbow Coalition a Global organization for human rights.

Now touchy subject for me starts. Gay Rights supporting women’s rights. Or even heterosexual women supporting Gay Rights. Some women due to husband might not support the Rainbow Coalition’s support of Homosexual rights, might not support Gay rights.

Homosexuals might not support women’s rights due to lack of support from women.

Plus the language I am going to use, I am using the word homosexual voting, might turn off a gay voter. A man who likes men, might vote as a woman would, some women actually vote along the line of gender. So a homosexual man might vote along the lines well he looked good in a photo, the way a woman might vote she’s a woman like me, we are a minority so I’m voting for her. Neither are thinking about capabilities of the candidates.

This is a global issue women supporting a man kissing a man.

The Rainbow Coalition has helped all sexes, all continents and all colors. This is why I support them and used them for my picture on this post. I need help thinking on how to get women to completely support Gay rights. If the Rainbow Coalition has ideas I will see posts on twitter, might be sporadic, but it is the best shot I have to see leadership guiding people around the world for global rights.

If Women support Gay rights, I am thinking the males that are homosexual would be onboard for support women’s rights. I’m not saying gay men are not supporting women’s rights but every vote counts. Sorry for the offensive language I will use, I’m trying to get to people who are heterosexual that will not vote for women, I call them homosexual voters.