Cycle of Violence within Politics

This tool is needed THORN it needs your help, DONATE to help stop child sexual abuse.

The-crucifixion-in-The-Life-of-Brian-1290006

Mrs. Bill Clinton gave me this idea and I wanted this so badly, I got this idea from thinking about her and watching her speak in the past. I got this idea from writing about them as a married couple. That the cycle of violence is on her and her husband, all they wanted to do was discuss laws and figure out what works in this country.

The crucifixion was about political speech. What do you think Jesus Christ was doing? He was walking around giving his political opinion without running for office. And he never had the vote for a Roman senator for his region of life. Nor did Jesus Christ have the ability to shape the laws of the land without giving his opinion openly. Which he did give his opinions to the point of a conviction with the death penalty.

The luxury about the Clinton’s is that they have the right to run for office, they have the right to their political opinion without the fear of violence against their bodies. That law is in  place to protect them, but the cycle of violent political speech continues even in this modern day.

Hillary Clinton could be crucified just for one bad political decision, that we put her in office to make. Her political future could die based on that. She risked her future and her families future to have that ability in the first place to make that bad decision. Prison can be a fate of an American politician, and it seems rare, right now, but it is the truth.

It was not extreme speech that places people in the cycle of violence in politics today, it is simply talking about preferences now from the preference of trees in a parking lot, to speaking of war to defend the country to protect resources of people and property, that political speech can lead to rocks in windows or threats to families. That is the cycle of violence.

The give give that was suggested is where political speech has to happen, but how when people want to force their own will and not hearing out how their will HURTS MANY!!!

Mrs. Clinton does not want many to be hurt, but she does want a give and take, you do this this reward happens, you do that the correctional facility is for you penalty. Budgets are the same way, you do this the money is there for you, you do that the correctional facility is there as a penalty. Give give is that simple, it takes away the threats of violence.

Mrs. Clinton is the best example for this blog post, because she has gone through so much politically, she is indeed like Jesus Christ. I will go over her record later, I am betting some already know what I can praise her for, just like Jesus Christ.

 

 

Right now but tomorrow…

gothic-2936549_960_720

Birch trees in this art is fantastic, and yes this art imagery is a death or birth. See interpretation is comprehension. And that being said, this is for both sexes right, that is a man right, or is that a woman, are those skulls man’s or woman’s. Interpretation of this can lead to truth or fiction, depending on perspective.

Men and women can see the same thing and get two different perspectives is old criminology, I don’t remember exactly the class I took in college. It might have been biology university level. The fact that one person can stand at one point and another at point of the same event. Both telling the truth can lead to the conviction in criminal court.

1920 men gave the women the vote.

Truth no other way to see that because women were not in office. Governor Sarah Palin, Alaska, was not in office at the time to help put that constitutional amendment in the bill of rights. That is the right perspective to see, but women in politics are not seeing that.

So when men gave women the vote were they abused into it, with what I wrote yesterday, “We made progress woman.” I think I know that is the truth. The cycle of violence speaking is there, as verbal sexual abuse on men.

I want gothic art on this page, because of the beauty and truth I see in it. Some people might claim I have a darker perspective, and as I wrote MILITANT about supporting women politicians that do win. Yes I supported Sarah Palin some in the 2007 election, which lead to years later the start Wise Women and Beyond. Just because my side wanted the win did not mean she needed to be abused during the election.

The fair fight of Barack Obama VS. John McCain was tarnished in my mind. And I have yet to write about that here. My retirement over from not giving my opinion on politics. Why I defended Governor Palin was because of my oil rich state is not a place for stupid people to live, Alaska. I know people who know Ms. Palin personally and the national media did not. I spoke up, and Mr Barack Obama my candidate still won. I loved speaking up, and when it was time for my retirement I went graciously quietly off.

John McCain passed away, and that need to defend him and Governor Palin happened so rapidly I did not think, I spoke up. I hope the family of Senator John McCain understands his serve needed to be represented not verbal sexual abuse on him on the day he died.

There is no other perspective on this issue, Sarah Palin was the second woman on a national ticket to run for Vice President. I know other women have run before her but they were not of the two national parties that the USA currently favors. So that is what history writes currently.

The art work above is shown as a perspective of either men or women. Why can’t we have that photo in how we communicate? The understanding that when we do politics we acknowledge who has the power in office due to the voters thinking about capabilities. The right now is what I just wrote, I know it needs to start being applied in everyday life for the next set of tomorrows. Which are as I know other right now’s that have not gotten here yet.