Tag: Thoughts

Dirt in the eye balls

dirtintheeye.png

Two children in a sandbox, one is a girl the other a little boy, both mothers off talking to each other having a fun time like the children. The little girl starts crying and the little boy tries to make nice, both moms look up and come over rapidly. Both moms grab the children gently and one is about to get scolded, which one do you think.

I love little boys, they are nice sweet and sometimes you do have to scold for violence. I love little girls, they are nice sweet and sometimes you do have to scold for violence. Yes, both but here is the above story, which got scolded, the little boy, while the little girl gets her eyes washed out.

That is the current women’s politics. Yes once again we have 19.4% women in politics at the centralized government level of the USA. I feel like the women have dirt in the eyeballs, and not seeing what is happening with the men. We preach the statistics but are not seeing the possibility that dirt is in our eyes, and no mommy’s to wash out the dirt.

I don’t know if the dirt in the eyes is an accident. It might be, the little boy might claim it is, that he moved and the dirt flew directly into the eyes of the little girl. 1920 is a gift to women, because no women could run for office at the time. No women held a governors office in any of the states. No woman was able to do much but hold a protest and get arrested for not following the law.

I am going into verbal sexual abuse that I am seeing, maybe I can wash the dirt from my own eyes. As a parent that is what we do anyway, wash the dirt out ourselves or go to the doctor, a little girl cannot wash the dirt from her own eyes. Neither can a little boy.

As an adult I might not like being called a girl, but I call myself that sometimes, like men might call themselves boy. As someone that might call herself a girl, I am seeing that men are verbally sexually abused, was this how women got the vote. After 80 years of protesting, if abuse was the end result to get the vote from the men that would mean the men gave us a toy and then threw the dirt in the eyes. Where was the toy in the upper scenario? It was not there, and the moms did not see it.

Maybe men think voting and law is just toys to play with for women, instead of tools. They gave in, you have it, see women you have candidates, what more do you want!!! I see that, I am hearing that on the media outlets even from women. That means he’s been abused. The man who voted for me to have the vote is being abused verbally in a sexual manner in his mind.

Men, in their minds, are being mentally sexually abused.

What more do you want? Screamed in the Hillary Clinton campaign for presidency. Screamed at Sarah Palin when she ran for Vice President, what more do you want? Men and women who love their sons and fathers and husbands screaming…

Okay, I know where to go, cycle of violence and time outs. How long of a time out is needed before healthy non-abusive debate begins…and voting is not thought of as a toy for women by men.

Men, in this country and around the world have been verbally sexually abused by their women, and some by men, to get them to what give women the vote??? Abused to a point where communication has been broken down to failure.

Voyeurism: The media movie industry drives these exploited people

tumblr_nuybxujiEe1sm0bo5o2_400-7184

I am apart of an exploited group of people, and as I’ve written, I am a female voyeur. That means I get pleasure watching people have sex, but that isn’t the only pleasure voyeurs can have. Being a voyeur is not completely sexual.

Watching the evening weather woman, I am so getting pleasure from updrafts of wind pressure readings and temperatures, but that is a form of voyeurism. I get pleasure still and I am a born in the 197-‘s baby. Yes, I can get pleasure from watching The Little Mermaid still, Walt Disney’s animated version. Voyeurism is not fetishism, yes you can watch a person acting out their fetish and get pleasure from that, but you are not doing that fetish nor are you, well maybe sometimes, wanting to have that fetish to be your own.

I did not get any pleasure from watching the hearing Thorn was in, a tool created by Ashton Kutcher to stop sexual abuse permanently, but that is my work. A voyeur could be working on a case and wanting to stop the sex offender, a police office, the voyeur is not the sexual offender, nor is the voyeur encouraging the behavior, actually the opposite the police officer is wishing the behavior away, hoping the person doing the sexual violence starts following gods rules. (which means children were not created for sexual intercourse.)

I have wished sexual abuse away permanently, I hope others do too with me.

The police officer is still acting out non-pleasurable voyeurism. Which is appropriate to catch something the should not be happening in the first place.

I want people to follow the RULES of being voyeurs, and the industry of media and movies needs to keep putting those rules into what they do… and I think they do. Why this is a celebration article, it is okay to admit to what men do, being a voyeur. And by following the already not spoken rules, I feel safe as a woman to admit, I like the Little Mermaid in my 40’s.

Sometimes we all need, men and women to celebrate the non-abusive rules of society. Those that have NEVER REALLY put men down, and acknowledge, “Yea men look.” Why women cannot look, who knows. I just feel safe, that might be because of men, to admit, I’m like you, I look too.

I am not doing what a man might think though, because I am not jumping up and going with somebody saying, “I’m going to disrespect you and force you to do something you don’t want to do at that moment, and maybe never.” Sometimes people have done this to self admitted female voyeurs. It has happened to me about sex, and it isn’t nice. I am watching, I might not be into doing.

The movie industry gets  loads of my money, exploiting my need for pleasure by watching. So does the media. So does the internet. We are a world of voyeurs, and men will admit it. I am a woman leading this, women are like men, we watch too. Celebrate it!!!

 

Time for my Handcuffs: The verbally sexually abused MAN

stock-photo-close-up-arrested-woman-handcuffed-hands-at-the-back-prisoner-or-arrested-terrorist-hacker-1147341092

Verbal sexual abuse of men has and still happens, and this sad truth is in our vocabulary. Calling a man “Peeping Tom” when he never looked in the first place,  the man might not have been a Peeping Tom, as I wrote in the last article, but that can cause a man to look into his self worth just with those words. These men are not raped but locked into stereo types and not able to leave them, women have done this to men. And maybe men have done this to men also.

My electorate is male and female, both sides vote, and men gave that right to women in 1920. Men still gave women the right to vote.

There is verbal abuse on men who dress in drag, he’s gay, and they have to take it. There is verbal abuse if a man wears drag and he isn’t gay. There is verbal abuse if a man doesn’t go after a woman the “guys and gals” think that man should go after. There is verbal abuse if a man stays with an ABUSIVE WOMAN, or people think he’s with an abusive woman. If a man wants to be celibate, or abstinence only there is verbal abuses a man endures. There is verbal abuse if he stays with a good woman. There is verbal abuse if he cheats, there is verbal abuse if he doesn’t cheat.

All these verbal abuses are sexual in nature, hence verbal sexual abuse.

Every abuse that is verbal on a man is SEXUAL IN NATURE, hence verbal sexual abuse.

The cycle of violence within just “joking around”,  we all live on this planet, and again I want to talk about how this affects politics and elections.

“Be a MAN.” Is something that I’ve heard said and I have said. That can be perceived as verbal sexual abuse. And that affects elections, in positive and/or negative ways.

How do you stop everyday joking around or actual verbal sexual violence on a man? I don’t want to really stop joking around here. I do want to stop ANY AND ALL verbal sexual violence on men. But if we do not acknowledge a global chronic issue, there is no chance for PEACE ON EARTH, GOOD WILL TO MEN AND WOMEN.

Again I am not perfect, get the handcuffs out police department, because I have issues. I have these speech issues, and in the moment catching them is not easy. I as a woman have probably stated the wrong thing. What I said could be joking around, but I think this has cost women whole elections. I know I am right.

So how do I get men to see what I am seeing. LOOOK LOOOK LOOK!!!!!! I am shouting. I see this, do they see? Nope, a lot of verbally sexually abused men might not be able to look up and see what a woman is seeing in the cycle of violence that they are involved in. And I am not going to throw feather pillows at this issue, so how to solve it? I hope it happens so I can joke around and not be abusive.

I want to empower men to vote for the best candidate, even if she is a woman.

 

Voyeurism: Non-abusive communication is about awareness

Screen-Shot-2018-05-26-at-11_37_25-PM

I am not perfect with non-abusive communication, and I think no one can be. But a person can be aware of it. I want to write more about women that enjoy voyeurism, and yes male strippers are known, and written about, but the voyeurism of it might not be. So off with opinion and little facts maybe some truth.

Male strippers are not the only forms of voyeurism that women enjoy, and why not just write about me as a known admitted woman into voyeurism.

I am a voyeur.

First there is the female voyeurism of dance, hence the male strippers, but what about the ballet or dancers in a Katie Perry show. Yes, there is no admitted actual sex involved but there are movements that symbolize sexual acts.

Second the voyeurism of a romantic movie. Yes, stupid sound tracks to tell you when to feel sexual toward the players, and these can be rated g movies, still voyeurism.

Third the voyeurism when public displays of affection are happening, this can get a little uncomfortable for myself, and others, but it is a form of voyeurism.

Fourth ANY MOVIE can turn on a voyeur.

Fifth a political speech can be seen as a voyeurism, you are there watching and smiling about a political topic. This is stimulation for some.

I’ll look for more areas I enjoy voyeurism later… like those wine glasses pictured above could be apart of my voyeurism.

FEMALE Voyeurs might not masturbate, men don’t. So why do women assume to be a voyeur you are lurking with your hands in your pants about men, yes there is an assumption there. MEN DO NOT DO THIS, and they engage in the act of VOYEURISM all the time, some not most.

I am guessing that the assumed hand in your pants voyeurism is about CRIMINAL PEEPING TOM STUFF. Sexual abuse.

This I think is good communication, it opens up a world of same person for women and men. BOTH ARE VOYEURS. BOTH SEXES look, getting pleasure from looking and as long as there is no public masturbations or if you know the rules of your home private/public masturbations meaning masturbations at inappropriate home times in a public space. I know everybody knows their home rules right???

I want to emphasis voyeurism is okay, and men do not masturbate or act on thoughts. Women are the same people. I look at women, my preferred. I do look at men. I am a voyeur and I get pleasure from activities that I can be myself. I love going to the movies, I am not sitting there rubbing my self, tits or vaginal area, if I am at a concert and watching dancers, I have seen this on youtube, nobody is acting out sexually, but the dancers on stage. But that is voyeurism.

Non-abusive communication is the goal, and cycle of violence ending is a goal. Men know the rules they set up, and everybody obeys or the police get involved. I like that. Women obey the same rules. This should be a start to get men to vote for women right?

 

 

Loving Consent

PYthaguros

I fell in love with a polyamorous woman. That does not mean I am a lesbian but it does. I  know that sentence means I want to talk about communication about sex, and I  know there is no secret word from my readers to tell me stop. Remember I am into BDSM and safe words because I am not into sexual abuses.

It was not hard telling her I could not come into her family, where she had two men with her at the time. I lived a few states away. I just wasn’t ready. And I was living far from her at the time. She lives closer to me now, I haven’t seen her in decades, but that is closed. I maybe polyamorous too.

I am not going to seek her out, and hers was a deep loving writing friendship, her love for me was in her writing and I saw that. She was there during my divorce when I needed her the most, and when I found out about polyamorous relationships it was from her.

Yes, she was my first polyamorous love. But I am the one that cannot commit. Just me, I am not into commitments. I am into my self-denial and celibacy, which is my Masochism. I was not practicing my masochism when I told the wonderful polyamorist lady that I could not join her closed family. I was being honest and I had hoped communicated well.

Masochism is when a person takes pleasure in self denial. I am not certain about humiliation, it is added into masochisms definition, I do not think I am a person that gets pleasure from being humiliated. But who knows maybe that is a truth I am not ready to face yet.

Example of a masochist, a comedian, Jimmy Fallon.

I want to make certain everybody knows a polyamory is NOT AN OPEN RELATIONSHIP WHERE EVERYBODY JOINS. It is a closed private relationship like monogamy.

Is it sexually abusive writing about sexual preferences? I don’t think so. But since this is about how people communicate. Masochism isn’t self abuse, people might think it is, but most are very cool with who I am in public. Privately if they have issues, I hope they keep their opinions to themselves, but if they do not, well my opinions are very public.

Being in a polyamory could feed voyeurisms. I am big into voyeurism, I go to the movies when I can and my collection of movies is extensive. I understand people into voyeurism can be exploited by the movie industry and it does this to us all the time. Providing interesting things to watch, so the industry is something I as a person into voyeurism loves.

I am not into sexual abuses of any kind, that is my BDSM and I want to go into that now. Explaining polyamory is a closed relationship is VERY important to me, what is also important to me is to speak on how to stop verbal abuses, again I am not one to speak right, I have to admit to being human and we all have speech issues when it comes to forming language when some terrible mean emotions come about.

Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism  is not about being into abusing.

IF YOU ARE INTO ABUSING PEOPLE YOU ARE FETISH AND NOT BDSM.

BDSM is into CONSENT. What is consent? It is permission to do what you want to a persons body by that person.

IF YOU ARE INTO NONCONSENT, there is a district attorney waiting to meet you and a judge to sentence you to a correctional facility.

ALL BDSM PEOPLE HATE NONCONSENT PEOPLE, consent is the sexual kink in BDSM. AND it is re-enforced in the teaching of BDSM. The safe word in BDSM is to stop any abuse that might be happening or perceived. And that word, as long as it is USED and respected, makes certain consent is right there at all times.

I am going to talk about my voyeurism because Ashton Kutcher did mention what Thorn does do. AND people using children to try to exploit me  and use my sexual kink need life time prison sentences.

I am BDSM, and as I wrote consent is my kink, tell me when a child is OLD ENOUGH TO CONSENT!!!!! They never will be.

I’ll watch Aston Kutcher on screen for Spread. That is voyeurism. I will not watch what Mr. Kutcher mentioned in his testimony, when he was talking about what he founded to catch and free children from sexual abuse: THORN. I refuse as a voyeur to even seek that viewing out.

Voyeurism is seeking out for sexual pleasure something to watch. I have found females very silent about their voyeurism needs, I am guessing it is because of Judeo-Christian family values that women and women’s magazines do not write about Females into voyeurism. I can get away with mine because of the industry, the movie industry. In the past women just were in orgy’s right for their voyeurism?

Anyway, I need to sum this up. People now know more about where I am coming from. I am completely into consensual sex and consensual non-abusive communication. I have not told how I got this enlightenment, just who I am… keep reading, because more women and men will communicate better before I die.

 

 

Men are Not Women

menandwomen

There is so much I want to say about this one topic. And others can too, men are simply not women. In 1920, Men gave women the vote. That being said it is like a Christmas gift that was begged for by women for decades since the revolutionary war. Men are just not women.

So begging is woman?  Yes, that is the truth, begging is what it seems to me what women had to do to get to 1920. That is abusive thinking on my part right.

That is cycle of violence thinking? Women begged and men were reluctant to grant a human right to women to own property and to vote? So is the honeymoon over after the vote was given in 1920, are women willing to stop the calm buildup and explode to get back to a honeymoon with men? I don’t want the first woman president to be a gift after women get mad!!!

I don’t want to be in a power struggle with men. I want power sharing. Not a communism because I am a capitalist by admission a long time ago, and I read the Communist Manifesto, by Carl Marx, and it is a concept that simply does not work in practice, when does the supreme dictator step down? To form the democracy? According to the manifesto the dictator sets up the democratic commune and then steps aside. It is a violent way to set up what we have currently, but the USA was not set up by a dictator but by a group of men…a Polyamory.

Our system is a republic, and other systems being elected parliaments work because people are forced or volunteer to step aside. So these systems work in practice, and I with others happily support.

Now I mentioned Polyamory as the way the USA was started, it was a group of men that loved discussing freedoms and not liking zero representation on taxation. That group of men founded this country. Our congress and senate are a true polyamory now, and open non-violent discussions ensue daily about what law needs to be in this home called the USA.

A Polyamory family might be able to get more women into office without abusive communication. Again going back to how women begged for the vote which is truth. There was no open communication, arrests happened on women’s rights leaders, and the cycle of violence happened. It is historic cycle of violence.

While this country was founded on non-violent discussion, the constitutional congress, but had to fight to escape the violence of not being able to have peaceful discussions. And it was violent and bloody escaping a person/country that wanted to control every aspect of the colonies, while the men came from a place/country of semi-peaceful elections to have representation.

Men currently are Great Britain to women, we have some representation but not… Men handed us the taxation representation we wanted but didn’t, the vote with no representation. There should not be a revolution, I don’t want a new country, with what land would women claim, there is no Greek amazon here in the USA. But there is violent abusive political discussion, and I am knowing I am in this political cycle of violence and I want out… I want representation.

 

 

 

 

Monogamy divorce rates: does it lead to cycle of violence or a sign of potential

327269132_Def_LAbout 40% to 50% of married couples in the United States divorce, according to the American Psychological Association. The divorce rate among those who remarry is even higher. – Feb 2, 2018 Google

The chilling truth communication problems in monogamies can lead to divorces. This is differences, the law is what brought the couple together right and the law breaks the couple apart. Communication problems, that some with successful marriages, is what people do not speak on in divorce court. That is the issue of this article.

Does cycle of violence lead to the divorce? In some cases yes. And when this is looked at right, nope this is never looked at, communication. Where to begin?

I am just a political writer with an opinion. But I have studied forms of sexual communication and this is the toughest to write about monogamy communication. I am not a therapist, lawyer, or child advocate. I am just someone that observed in my life experiences that communication in monogamies based on statistics is weak and/or non-existent in 50% of the lawful marriages.

Is the cycle of violence the cause for most divorces? Did the cycle of violence exist before the marriage? Unless there is a licensed therapist all I have are statistics. And maybe those families that are in the cycle of violence communication will get defensive when reading this article.

DomesticViolence_Cycle

This cycle of violence is not in all monogamies, but I have found from observation that it is in some.

Wise Women and Beyond will not be a judge of this, I just want people, women, children and men out of the cycle of violence, which is a cycle of bad communication. If people are in this cycle of violence bad communication how can I hope to get men to support women running for office. How does the country get back to the non-abuse that gave women the vote from willing happy communicative males that were not in a honey-moon period?

If people can pinpoint communication issues they personally have, and I have my own communication issues, I’m far from perfect, rescues into Foster Care can happen faster. Foster Care will be able to speak better to the public and good caregivers will be attracted into the system.

The system at school can see that a child is having speech issues due to speaking from the cycle of violence learned at home, the system can get the child into care faster. Then, a nanny state can be avoided by people in the future, and people can help each other. Isn’t that the goal of social services in the first place? Helping society find less bad communication that leads to abuses of all sorts.

I am not saying monogamies have bad communication all the time, it is just observed.

 

 

 

 

My own Hypocrisy 9/11

butterfly

This sad day happened and for me I was here in Anchorage, Alaska, on Lake Otis, well a little off that road near Dimond BLVD, and I was getting a phone call. “Amanda, have you seen what is happening?” I turned on TV and there it was a burning tower. I was unsaved then, since my save date for taking Jesus inside is 9/22/2011.

I was no where near my fathers home, on Muldoon Rd, off of the military base. I was no where near my family in New York State, and I did talk to my dad later about where they were, no where near luckily. Like everybody else I watched the towers fall to the ground with footage going over and over and over and over of the planes, two, hitting the towers.

My reaction over the past couple of decades, well, it really isn’t a couple of decades, nearly, has been what I am, and this Mutt will take time to explain where I come from.

Terrorism is an act of creating fear. I refused to be fearful while I watched this nation grieve. I complained and partied. And nobody was complaining and partying, maybe privately. I did so on line many times, and yes even today I want a 9/11 music mix to sing to and say the dead in those towers deserve smiles and memories that are good created today. The people in the PLANES deserve nothing from me. ABSOLUTLY NOTHING!!!!

I mean the pilots not the passengers.

Something kicks in from my Irish/Native American grandfather side of my family, and that side had married my grandmother the Russian/polish woman which I do not think has if you grieve you party like the Irish. On my mom’s side what I do is highly inappropriate but she was English/native mix her mother and her father would’ve been shamed with his French/Mediterranean (African northern). Muslims are photo’d grieving, and my grandfather was catholic, so not Muslim, but he had traditions that were clearly that region of the world.

My Irish/native American hard working grandfather (dad’s Side) did party, a lot and laughed and was one of those men you go good man, he just partied a lot with his family. He might have told me what I did was inappropriate like many other people have. I still want to celebrate the victims lives. NOT BE FEARFUL BECAUSE…it might happen again.

Some movies were told to be made too soon, this person might have publically agreed which is my hypocrisy. I am a hypocrite, on one hand I did my thing to honor the victims of the pilots, while Hollywood did the same thing, I’m the same as the action stars but I was a hypocrite, them too.

I hope to stop my hypocrisy and start enjoying 9/11 tribute movies. I haven’t yet, and I want to add them to my party today, I do inappropriately but very IRISH OF ME.

 

 

Bill and Hillary Clinton show a communication nobody is showing in politics

150303_POL_Clintons2012_jpg_CROP_promo-mediumlarge

Mention her senator election, her secretary of state time, and both runs for becoming president this is my expectation for this post, that Hillary Clinton is this accomplished woman. I also need to mention how former President Clinton has done the support of 1920 men that gave women the vote, and he used that upon his own spouse Hillary Clinton.

I am not capable to write a politics novel on this topic, and I know someone will plus get the money from that becoming a best seller. I know my capabilities and I might have seemed abusive in the past to the candidate Hillary Clinton. I do not love that cycle of violence and I am continuing to learn about that very topic and applying that all over the place, including writing about Mrs. Hillary Clinton.

This is a honeymoon article, maybe I can stay in that forever, but then my expectations of the couple happen and I get disappointed. That leads to me leaving and going after another candidate. Going well, I see the capabilities of the couple, and the candidate Hillary Clinton, but I am not controlling what they are representing, so they cannot represent me based on that little tiny detail.

I need to give up that tiny detail right, and it might be a miscommunication. I had to learn about the cycle of violence because it affects me personally, and to attract an abuser sometimes abuse happens, mine is politics, I am definitely in a cycle of victory and loser politics, and that attracted abusers who do not communicate well into my life, making myself their victim.

Does Hillary Clinton not communicate well, NO, she is one of the best communicators on the planet. And so is her husband Bill Clinton. That communication is in how both thrive together in a political environment. When Mr. Clinton was in office in the 1990’s the communication between the two was scene with him trying to step back during the health care law that Hillary Clinton was trying to put through. The problem was she was his wife, and the media abused her for doing what Ashton Kutcher has done for his company and need to save women and children from sex trafficking.

I’m sorry Mr. Kutcher for using you, but I am using your time in front of a congressional panel, you are a respected private citizen. There is no difference, between you and Hillary Clinton. She is a private citizen proposing law at the time. Ashton Kutcher, he is a private citizen proposing to a panel the same thing.

That communication President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton had led to her win as Senator of New York  State, my birth state. And then gracious handing over the nomination to President Obama during his first election. The communication between the couple, to me, is non-abusive communication, and there seems to be from observation no cycle of violence. So why can’t other men be like Mr. Clinton and support spouses for assembly, the senate, the congress, and the president? I don’t know.

As I said the communication alone is a best selling novel. Someone will write someday. I wanted this for WWAB, because somewhere in our nation the fear of communication has to be faced, and we will really be the home of the brave then.

 

 

Polygamy no PORN needed: Polyamory where is the orgy???

eminemsuper

Polygamy’s might have orgy’s, might, that I am not researching for this post. A polyamory might have orgy’s, see they are the same concept. I do know without research an orgy if spoken about and consented too a polyamory has them.

Polyamory is called immoral because of the orgy’s of the past. And yes that is insulting to true polyamorist. I am once again Bondage Dominance Sadomasochism. When I was introduced to a polyamorist family, I was enlightened they are same as me, just not into BDSM as what they call themselves. I was delighted about the loving conversation and about consent and love.

First a polyamory family involves women and men, it is not a polygamy. Second the polyamory believes and puts into practice the same rules of sexual conversation as a BDSM person. I kept my BDSM to myself and did state to the woman who is the polyamorist I could be like her, never really speaking on who I am, which means I communicated poorly. I was asked, and told her I was not ready for a commitment in her family. I am still thinking of her loving her in the way I can, and she would say that is true polyamorist. Third a polyamory can lead to children from two men on one woman, so that might seem immoral when both daddies have consented to this and LIVE WITH THE MOTHER.

TWO DADDIES LIVE IN THE SAME HOME AS THE MOTHER.

I am in love with the woman who introduced Polyamory to me, but I am still not ready for the commitment that is needed with her. So I am here explaining that to an audience to explain open sexual communication. Sadly, I do not speak with her any longer because of myself and my own needs.

Consent is the key to all three types of sexual behavior. A polygamy a woman and a man consent. Polyamory a woman and a man consent. BDSM a woman and a man consent and go deeper with specific wording in sexual behavior.

Abusive conversation can happen in all sexual relationships. Polyamory and BDSM address this openly trying to not abuse sexually anybody. I am saying this conversation does not happen in polygamy or monogamies. I have proof in monogamies that might have needed to become polyamory’s, because divorce courts and family courts are full of people wanting no open naked sexual conversation about their sexual needs.

I have a hard time getting people to speak about open communication. Polyamory is not there to set up orgy’s. It is not immoral.

In a polygamy, I wrote porn not needed. That truth might floor people, but where is the man’s need to watch other men have sex. There would be none. That man might have a need to see woman on woman action, but him watching other men in a voyeurism isn’t there.

Polyamorist might not be into orgy’s. But they are into the communication and consent of orgy’s. A polyamorist is not into unconsentual sex. That is an abomination to a polyamorist, like it is an abomination to a BDSM person.

Polyamory is about loving communication, so is BDSM. That loving communication is not just sexual. And that means Polyamory isn’t about voyeurism or orgy’s unless that is completely talked about and consented to in a polyamorous group. So my headline brought people in, it is a woman’s right to chose what she is sexually. And I am going to explore all of this some more.

Polygamy’s might not love a polygamous family, but communication is key to both. And both might exist in a world where they are illegal and I still say keep them illegal, even if I am who I am, perhaps a polyamous person after all.