Reminiscing

prayingonpoint

Steve Jobs and other inventors if they stayed reminiscing on what almost happened and or what did happen but did not work there would be no progress. Women’s politics is a lot of reminiscing. I do that, other women do that.

I need my naked thoughts again, but my thoughts like my person is not naked. Nor are everybody else’s. People lie, they lie to each other and themselves. Advertising is lying to sell stuff. Attractions to say we are the same is to sell what? Yes, women’s politicians are the same as men… etc.

Focus on nudity first, stripping those thoughts that almost work  but do not. What almost works bra burning? Still no woman president. Men do not wear bras. What almost works? Throwing a token candidate that is female into an election and then make fun of her. Still no woman vice president.

What does not work? Emasculating men. Not really, men still are macho male man stuff. They still run things. What does not work? Lies. Lies. Lies.

But the lies do work.

Women lie about the goals of women’s politics all the time. The goals of women politician are really never budgets or law enforcement or national security. It is family, daycare and health care that stands out, then why would you want a woman president or vice  president.

Well if a woman is a president law enforcement has to be deeply looked into. But does that vilify the man. I know I’m going to be called a liar now because current females women girls in office work with the men on major law enforcement and national security issues. So nudity of my own thoughts are not there yet. Still no woman president.

I’m not nude, so I am left with REMINISCING, we can do this but… but what?

 

 

 

 

Naked and not wanting his opinion

power

Do I want men to have power over me?

Seems like a normal women’s rights question, and then you find yourself somewhere kidnapped and sex trafficked because you decided to not make or put forward the power of your man’s words.

Do I want to have man’s opinion have power on me?

Advertisers are men. Men run the Congress and Sentate with 19.4% women elected. Men voted for women to have the vote, because men were in power at the time. Men are the most powerful in the fashion industry for centuries maybe millennium. Men have the power over our bodies sometimes by opinion on how we look to them. We let that opinion have power.

So men have power is established. That means I am going down a stupid road. I’m stupid right, like many women’s rights advocates in the past accept 1920. (1920 August  20 the 19th amendment for vote est.)

Why did women go stupid?

Not every women is sex trafficked. But the lack of listening to a man’s opinion has lost elections for women. I don’t like that.

My nudity on line I have used before and it is stripping time. That is Wise Women and Beyond, naked women in the wilderness not protecting themselves from the elements and wanting just that truth. We are naked. What do we do now, just act like the animal we are, or acknowledge that we want the lies that we are not naked under our thoughts?

Man has power because of his naked body. First he does have more muscles in his abdomen area. That power is used as his opinion. His thoughts are how strong is his abdomen. Then he shows power on how many women he has used his abdomen on. Second his power is in his shoulder area because of his more built abdomen. Men are not like women where our power is in our legs, but our legs are not built for sprinting speed, our power in our legs is to hold balance. These power areas go into the man’s mind. Not that it goes to his head to use his body forcefully, and we do have laws to stop men from using their bodies forcefully on women. Women just do not have the physical body to seem powerful to a man.

Women’s bodies being built differently does not mean we are lacking in the same mind power but a woman needs to find where her power lies. Again the word lies, am I really about to lie about the strength in a woman’s pelvic bone area down to her legs to her feet?

I do not want the lie, but I might find it, again being naked online trying to find the right words to move both men and women to be partners at the voting booth and in business.

What if what I just found is the truth but we tell people, no your lying? The truth about women is our bodies change and extra weight is something that never changes, a baby puts stress on bone below the chest area. I know using what we are as the power for use to assert on men… no I’m lying. Where is the truth?

I do not want a man’s opinion, just give me the votes, I am like you. I have the power, just not centered in my abdomen. Just like a man I want to draw from that power and have my opinion and leadership. Yea right, most of the politicians are still men, most of the advertisers men, most of the world wants power from abs and shoulders, not hips and legs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Invictus: A Woman’s right post war or service to be a champion

InvictusGamesSydney2018medallaunch

Prince Harry Duke of Sussex before marriage to Princess Megan Duchess of Sussex started a successful organization that supports the troops that were injured during service, Invictus. This idea started when Prince Harry served honorably in the Great Britain Army Air Corp, with honorable serve in Helmand, Afghanistan during the Afghanistan war.

2014 was the start, where men and women that served in the armed forces started competing. When men and women can enlist they are very young, most 18 years old looking for a way to serve their countries that they are proud to be apart of, others looking to gain an educational grant, and after school they continue to serve their communities proudly. Those people who enlisted had no time to train for the Olympics summer or winter games. Invictus let’s those service men and women have Olympic dreams, but also builds self worth, self esteem and power over the injury that they sustained during honorable service.

I found out about this in Orlando, Florida, when I was living there, but found myself too poor to attend the games. I was working for the Walt Disney World Complex and could’ve broken in, with the tickets at 65 dollars for the spectators to support the troops I could not afford the ticket. I decided not to steal from the honorably discharged disabled veterans, and not attend. That saddened me, so I vowed during that time to support Invictus anyway I could. SO I write tweets once in a while, well this year and last only close to the games. My dad is a 100% disabled veteran PTSD, and my heart is with Invictus games.

My dad as a Vietnam veteran and could’ve used the games, there might have been a baseball team for veterans and gold for him. That was not possible since the games only started this decade, and not in the 1970’s when Vietnam veterans needed them the most.

Wise Women and Beyond is a political blog. This blog is about the politics of women in the service of the military, and I support Invictus. Some countries still do not support Invictus and military service of women, on this I have little opinion, even if you do not support the western worlds ideas for women’s rights, you need to support your own troops and send men to compete for your countries.

This means some middle eastern countries have opted to boycott Invictus, leaving injured males without this outlet in their own countries. So I will say that is wrong, just because the western world lets women serve, does not mean you do not let men who are injured not compete for glory of your country. You do not have to send women since they did not serve in your military.

Thank you. I want to watch the Sydney, Australia games, I have no passport and am still very poor so I might not have the right cable tv channel. My heart is with the veterans of every country in attendance. Win!

 

W

amanneeds

First a man kicks a woman, possibly with his hips, and then he expects us women to kick each other around killing self love and our bodies at the same time. This is not right.

I need male voters, but if we do not talk about what seems to be expected and accomplished by women on women, we lose our own vote for ourselves.

A woman is like a glass door, she swings open letting men or women in, then she swings shut, sometimes there is only one man or woman that has the right vigor to open the door, sometimes there are many men and women because the door was oiled too nicely.

Women beating up women has been written about so much that this topic should be dead. It still happens. And men encourage this because it makes them feel? Feel fucking what, most men I have known goes that is a woman’s thing, shakes their head, and does their investing, golf, football, sex time, later?

The women are fighting again? Yuck? What Can I do, pull them off of each other or should I go get jello and throw it on them. Jello? You have to be kidding.

Why are the women fighting, again the kick with the hips comes in mind? Does that kick feel that good? Wow, reproduction comes to mind, the women are fighting because of hip abuse.

The sign of course has abuse openly in it, especially the “Do not count on me” being vaguely suggested by a man. That is abusive to a woman that wants to be there for the man and it might not be reproductive why she wants to be there for him, like a friend with NO BENEFITS, a plutonic relationship. But it could be reproductive because of the abusive kick from the mans hips into her pelvic region feels good.

So why do men expect women to fight with women?

That expectation, once again, was dismissed by me because of men that have been in my reality. It was proposed in the picture that one  woman is better than the other.  The men in my reality just ignore women fighting but the picture suggests other wise, and I did mention jello wrestling.

Men fight with men. That is a given that I am not wanting to think about. Again I am going to be about me. I wrote in my last post that I want the macho man. A man that can support this blog, and have no ego about it, but also a man that lets me have my long hair feminine clothing knowing I am woman. But men fight with men.

Wild men. Okay animal males fight with other animal males for females. That isn’t really humans. At least the men I have had in my life have been, well there is another female and then another female and then another female and then another female so many females… they have no time fighting with each other for women because the women are throwing themselves at the men.

I sit back and watch. Going wow, uhm, I know you are wanted body wise man but what about your mind. Nope dick service is all the women do, and then they scream “I’ve had my baby.” Diaper conversation ensues.

I am lesbian for this post, I’m venus aphrodite, and yes probably for life, so my perspective has been women watching. I might not get women voters, because heck most women are heterosexual wanting children. Men want these women, and gave all women the vote.

So women fighting with women happens, encouraged by men my perspective no, the pictures perspective yes, and I know what I have written. Men need to help women, how when a man needs a woman… even a gay  man needs the feminine gay man.

Reading making certain I get this right, the next part is bodies and self esteem. Again  men that I know are too busy to care about my body image needs or self esteem. But once again I am running into truth about the topic, sex right?

Those men are off with maybe hot women, a few need to go to the gym and stop starving themselves, I know my perspective is the starving woman. Men do not care. They are with whom is the right now, not the right one. Okay again my own perspective there. This is getting wordy and off topic. The abuse women do on women, because? Men.

I think I did bring in my perspective on a topic of men being too busy with too many women, I do not have any other perspective. Maybe because they are too busy they never noticed the fighting amongst women… that does cost women votes from women in the first place.

The dead horse will be revisited by me, with contradiction and maybe being militant. Voters, WWAB needs to focus on that.

 

 

Wise Women and Beyond; WWAB Roman numeral for AB no such thing

slime

There is no such thing as Wise women or men, no such thing for men being beyond women? Well, that is what I am doing, I am creating Wise Women and Beyond.

I wanted this, so I am selfish.

Politicians are known as slimey I. AB is AND BEYOND can be slimey, not nice and truthful. Due to being truthful, I might be told you are spreading lies, that is the funny part about the truth, people can lie about the truth.

The sky is purple, when it is bright blue.

Men gave the women the vote, 1920 August 2, a congress and senate full of men, and then men all across the country in each of the states legislatures and governors. Men, slimy good for nothing men.

This blog is to explore ideas, how do you get the support of men again? We don’t currently proof 19.4% women in congress and the senate. NO first woman president, no first woman vice-president, some states no first woman governor just a few examples of what is going on in woman’s rights.

Wise Women and Beyond is about the wise women of the past and how they did get men to support them in gaining ownership of property, and the vote.

How do I get the AND BEYOND involved?

The AND BEYOND IS MEN! Am I too militant?

Men are considered slimy, and the AB is in slime on my opening selling picture. Men want sex, they want control, they lie, and as I wrote they are good for nothing. They gave us the VOTE.

Men are fantastic, mine, I believe in Adam and Eve is a pretty face. Yes I know pretty not very complimentary. He has his hypocrisy’s, do I have mine, I’ll explore that later.

One of my hypocrisy’s is this; I might want doors open for me by men and a man to smash his fist in a child molester’s face and then have the police take that child molester in so a judge could send the child molester to prison. Yes I want justice for children of child sexual abuse, and men should be able to beat the living crap out of child molesters and send them to prison.

Yes that need for the macho man is me. So that might get explored later.

So can the macho man be for women’s rights, YES HE CAN!

Wise women and beyond is just that a wise woman wanting politics and voters, making certain to include the AND BEYOND, the men.

 

 

 

 

Twitter social media And political Distraction for Children’s and Women’s rights: FBI come out for me…

maxresdefaultI do use social media and twitter, is there a distraction there about children’s rights and women’s rights?

I do not know so I am going to write down ideas and see if I agree with the above question.

I have been an author, and I use sexual stuff in my writing, in my mind people have the right to state, I am not reading what you write, I have written adult content even here on this new blog. People still have the right not to read me. But on twitter, is there human rights violations happening before your eyes. That might be happening. Or other social networking places.

Ashton Kutcher do not pretend to be children’s programing. I’m the same.

I am not dabbling like Ashton has in children’s content.

Ashton Kutcher has Open Season, that might lead to children coming over to his twitter account. And do parents want children to know about sex trafficking? Has Ashton Kutcher violated human rights of children by trying to push forward the human right to not be kidnapped and sexualized?

What is my right as a content creator about children’s rights? I cannot pussy foot around this issue because it is woman’s rights.

Why can’t twitter be like Netflix, it is so simple, a place for kids, where an adult account like mine has no place of being or going. Yes I can go over to read Netflix for kids. But maybe I don’t wanna read kids on twitter. I don’t even look but a child pornographer might.

What I did see on Justin Timberlake’s twitter account feed is parents innocently having children dance to his CHILDREN”S CONTENT, Can’t Stop the Feeling from Trolls, but then I saw a stripper… I don’t know, I write adult stuff, I don’t really want to censor myself for a parent… FBI come and get me, bad old Amanda doing her same old politics…

Justin Timberlake is an adult star with both adult and children’s content. What I would love to see is a split on his account, go here for kids content, go here for the adult content, separating out the videos where kids are dancing and the strippers.

Jimmy Fallon, another example, and the Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon is an adult artist. Ewww is not for children, but he is in open space Twitter. Do you think he’s on late night for your children to view his show? But Twitter is during the day.

SNL, I could go on and on about adult content.

I don’t know how many people view a Twitter stream and then try to show their child something, oops I lost that scroll, the child is watching, ignore that woman’s selfie she showed cleavage… on SNL’s twitter feed.

I am an adult content generator. I know all I really want is adults attention. I know for money to sustain lifestyles some entertainers/action stars do children’s media. Why can’t social media have areas safe for children?

NOW FBI and international investigators, I live in Anchorage, ALASKA currently and I am not paranoid… Can’t be I was on the NO FLY LIST. I break laws about internet daily about content… I write adult content and a child might have been exposed. I cannot stop that, right? This is total BS right, oh California once again I am not placing a shield on this web-site saying this isn’t for children… Law smashed to bits…

Rainbow Coalition: Homosexual Rights

RCYK-Logo-Horizontal-01

I wanted something all inclusive for the Rainbow Coalition, so I found their Yellowknife logo and used it for my gay rights post. I am reaching out only to homosexuals in this post, and no other group, but I wanted to point out the Rainbow Coalition does work on rights for everybody. The logo is from Canada, making the Rainbow Coalition a Global organization for human rights.

Now touchy subject for me starts. Gay Rights supporting women’s rights. Or even heterosexual women supporting Gay Rights. Some women due to husband might not support the Rainbow Coalition’s support of Homosexual rights, might not support Gay rights.

Homosexuals might not support women’s rights due to lack of support from women.

Plus the language I am going to use, I am using the word homosexual voting, might turn off a gay voter. A man who likes men, might vote as a woman would, some women actually vote along the line of gender. So a homosexual man might vote along the lines well he looked good in a photo, the way a woman might vote she’s a woman like me, we are a minority so I’m voting for her. Neither are thinking about capabilities of the candidates.

This is a global issue women supporting a man kissing a man.

The Rainbow Coalition has helped all sexes, all continents and all colors. This is why I support them and used them for my picture on this post. I need help thinking on how to get women to completely support Gay rights. If the Rainbow Coalition has ideas I will see posts on twitter, might be sporadic, but it is the best shot I have to see leadership guiding people around the world for global rights.

If Women support Gay rights, I am thinking the males that are homosexual would be onboard for support women’s rights. I’m not saying gay men are not supporting women’s rights but every vote counts. Sorry for the offensive language I will use, I’m trying to get to people who are heterosexual that will not vote for women, I call them homosexual voters.

 

Polyamory Vs Polygamy

drewpolygamy

This is the Brown family above, and they are a family trying to explain the most conservative family created: polygamy. The polygamy can be found in the wild as the best form of reproduction, if males are dying at birth, which they do. In man the males are not dying but the oldest form of reproduction family still lives and is enjoyed.

If a man like Mr. Brown has problem being a dominant male who knows. The threat to him is starting to be created, Polyamory. Where another adult male would be living amongst his, Mr. Brown’s females, in the same household, that male is not his son. And it is for sexual purposes. The perception is that both males would be polygamous, but they are not they are in a relationship with each other as well as the woman, just another form of family but VERY Liberal.

Back to the conservative Mr. Brown, the highest most conservative man has to fight for his right with his women just for acceptance. I say, my opinion only, keep what he is doing ILLEGAL. There is now gay marriage where sister wives can marry for purposes of tax breaks, and that would show in a polygamy what I’ve seen in Big Love and I might have watched one or two episodes of Mr. Brown’s TV show, the women marrying a woman would show the family that Mr. Brown wants. Then they stay with him of course.

But there is no Big Love for Mr. Brown’s sons, they have to move out eventually, because they are threats sexually to Mr. Brown’s other wives not their mothers. So here is my suggestion, some liberal value comes in, and Mr. Brown’s sons can become a Polyamory.

I’ll explain. The threat of a full grown male is why polygamys do thrive. These men want more than one woman, because of various reasons. These males use the females need for one male to their reproductive advantage, and lets face it, it is best for children that stability is gained in a relationship, so some females seek out a polygamy for just that. Sometimes monogamy’s do not seem stable enough to raise children in.

Communication is the key to having another full grown male living within a polygamy setting. Polyamory is just that, a group of men and women living in the same home. Mr. Brown would have to open his sexual communication amongst his wives, and with his son, if his son wanted to stay in the home, Mr. Brown would have to lay down strict boundaries. If his son brings in more women that communication has to be used to create a more tight family unit.

This communication is encouraged in Polyamories, but when I watched programs like Big Love and Mr. Browns show (one to two episodes) I did not see the open communication. Polyamory is a communication relationship.

Going from conservative Polygamy, to liberal Polyamory, the only difference is communication and number of males involved. In a polygamy there is one male involved. IN a polyamory more than one is required of males, both have unlimited females.

Both can stay illegal now with the advent of gay marriage being legal, each couple gets tax breaks. Yes firecodes for occupancy need to be revisited for both kinds of families.

I used Mr.Brown’s photo for a famous polygamy, not to be bigoted, I’m into the idea of polyamory, and for me that works. It helps males have more than one female, but it helps females that need other males around.

I need to explored the con’s vs the pro’s in a later article, this is getting too wordy.  This is a woman’s rights issue seldom looked at, and as I said this liberal would love to see polygamy’s stay illegal.

I want to apologize to the Brown family for this article and I hope to use them again, I did not vilify you, but I am stating fact, you are the most conservative, and I am liberal.

 

 

Law enforcement on Males by Males

maxresdefault

The photo is not the title, but this is Wise Women and Beyond. In our world what law, that is being enforced in the photo, was mostly made by a man. I go back to the 19.4% women in the Congress and in the Senate of the USA currently but it is global on whom is creating the law. Men!

So this is about sexual assault. The woman in the photo does not know I am writing about sex abuse on little girls currently or sex trafficking. She does not know that global laws that need money for enforcement and money to create tougher laws to stop sexual abuse of children are created by men. The very men that might buy a little girl.

So here is the problem, without women in politics the law enforcement is lacking. Men are trying to hide sexual crap that they are doing and it is reflecting in law enforcement. I do not like this truth and it could get me in big trouble. Big deal I was already frisked when I got myself on the NO FLY LIST.

The very laws to protect women and children are not paid for, for enforcement. Yes you read on the passage of a law to protect women from 1st degree rape, sodomy, slavery is over in most places of the world due to law creation, but the monies for enforcement for the police, where is it?

Sneaky isn’t it of men. Yes we will create the law… but enforce? Yes there is a working judicial system, there is foster care here in the USA, there is support for post care somewhat (where is the money?)

So we have token headlines once in a while the bad guy was caught. Post care paid for and everybody is okay.

Maybe with more women involved in politics funding would be fought for. FUNDING is a political hot potato, you get the law and then no enforcement but some are enforced on? We can only afford a percentage of law enforcement? I don’t know but it is a funny sneaky thing men have done politically speaking.

So men are enforcing law on men. That truth is women’s politics. Where is women enforcing law on men?

 

 

Men Need to be Included

blueman

1920 no woman held office. Not many women owned businesses, women were on marches before for nearly a century just to get noticed… who finally noticed women were not full citizens of the USA or voters: MEN.

This is lost in the current women’s movement. The movement seems to be there with 19.4% women between the congress and the senate. If the country is 50% men and women the congress and senate do not reflect the population. So the women’s movement has a lot of work to do still.

HOW DO YOU GET MEN INTERESTED IN WOMEN AGAIN?

We have a whole bunch of homosexual males then doing politics. Get it men for men and only men for the family, a homosexual family. Well, it takes women to create the family.

So 19.4% women create the population of 320 million?

That leaves 80.6% just fucking around with male gentiles. Get it 19.4% means we’re back to the Babyboomer’s being created with each woman having 6 children per household. But household’s of women are having more children and a lot of those children are homosexual.

Men need to be included. We have on one hand politicians claiming to be for women’s rights, and then on the other hand it not reflecting in the elections of capable women being encouraged to run for office and getting elected on skills not gender.

That comes into the problem of this writing blog. How do you encourage men to see women as a household runner and not just a sexual uterus. And the household is the government of the USA?

Well, if the men are all homosexual politically, proof there are 80.6% males in congress and senate, then the sexual woman is excluded in politics. But men claim to be heterosexual at home parading around children in the strollers and car seats proudly. There I am man I reproduced.

Yes I am bringing sex into politics, maybe that will get man’s attention. The homosexual males in each district that insist a man can only lead a household is OBVIOUS.

Women will have to admit they are just uterus’s if this is not working to get man’s attention. Because that is all we are in congress currently, token uterus’s that might be given a speech to show we can stand  beside men. Women need to admit how we got the vote took decades, because men were not noticing us accept that we have a uterus. But we still ran that household while the men were out… why not 50% of us running the household here in the USA. And budgeting is more for women about that home budget right?

Men are needed… stop being a homosexual for running this country.